From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1FWh-0000iJ-MP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:38:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1FWd-0006tp-8k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:38:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1FWd-0006th-4q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:38:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1FWc-00082z-VF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:38:02 -0400 Subject: bug#28748: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-guzzle-sphinx-theme. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 13:37:51 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20171008173751.GB26253@jasmine.lan> References: <20171008151419.22561-1-me@tobias.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171008151419.22561-1-me@tobias.gr> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 28748-done@debbugs.gnu.org --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 05:14:19PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-guzzle-sphinx-theme) > (python2-guzzle-sphinx-theme): New variables. > --- >=20 > Guix, >=20 > This adds a dependency of the new borg@1.1.0. >=20 > I've included a python2- variant out of habit. > Pipe up if this needless frippery offends you. >=20 > Kind regards, >=20 > T G-R I also had this package prepared :) I used your description, which is much better than what I had, and pushed as d7eb680d85af810886af908916204a9ee7e68f10. --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlnaYm8ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwj24hAA7GaxRTlpYGDvQxG80pSw8Oau+Tl9BM8VxOCR88JdiOnvskaVkwiIB+M9 z6bqhnUupCYUoTCRSmzRX2OEy2jcrL34zvgeKXZnkaNM4fGKEU4NyPgQFzJ/qWxV U031jLscT/sZtLMAFtBzWUpitR91GuO+lY+IUIi+e9v1pba7TfaAcpGUQRuoOgnp WyiigQw6vZHZ3n2n5QPS3Tu+rimNftPC3RioNQWo1OQNBsQZ8tkEWJEnOEvzjRxR lo5tsDLiedkwN+nydWmqurD0SudWuAC4koNJcPUMfChCu7yODMy/dnXX7JP4bQ26 xh7x2nwATJfIzgKoFGGb4mK2dan53VpD+W9TRZP37dStHNEzrkwh5mP9ottnlrLv /cO5gCGcyefIzz1ePQqdmoqvOVhh3q8EOm6Ax4pYi5L9PG/iIxVE66M3OLXAsUD4 dG4qdzIedoXDchvCcItPkdYB1YdPcb1Az/EyE8ZoOBz2asn8Gx/D6XPMwoygi/Af uADm/UEOH3JLX3HLyAv2QtbW1ib/hzW+lbw1wC1hs7L58eV7iUw3S5ZX2QS3EqbF XePVb7fnZhiSnrZnfuqnTZI7MIdUlKsw6oW39fZh7eh+gmBrPBsPo6DEZPNBSRZz 3Kk+zkEiVUzUHt4p3Qsoj+UdUAnAGhMbd9PDXqSSRSEXY4KTtnw= =5iAM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM--