Christopher Baines transcribed 2.8K bytes: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:23:09 +0000 > ng0 wrote: > > > Christopher Baines transcribed 2.1K bytes: > > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:57:26 +0000 > > > ng0 wrote: > > > > > > > The dependency chain of GNUnet demands GnuTLS with DANE support. > > > > You can use it without DANE, but there are certain parts which > > > > will not work. DANE is recommended. (ports of FREEBSD uses > > > > gnutls-dane for libmicrohttpd aswell for example). > > > > > > > From c9dedfd1a6f91d557006b00505a428be84102b1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > > > > 2001 From: ng0 > > > > Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:28:51 +0000 > > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: gnutls: Add 'gnutls-dane'. > > > > > > > > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls/dane): New variable. > > > > > > Hey, so I'm trying to do some reviewing. > > > > > > What was your reasoning for creating a new gnutls/dane package, > > > rather than adding unbound to the existing gnutls package? > > > > > > I don't know much about GnuTLS, but it would be good to make it > > > clear why this approach was taken, especially in the commit message > > > and by the gnutls/dane package definition. > > > > Honestly, I did not want to touch the gnutls package for this. > > I wanted to leave the option open to have gnutls without dane. > > Sure, it's a useful feature. If you think I should apply it > > directly to gnutls, tell me and I'll send a new patch. > > I'm happy with that reason, if you could put that in the relevant > commit message, or in a comment by the gnutls/dane package definition > (or both), I'll check I can build all the changed packages, and push > if they all build for me. …and I need to send it again, there were some changes introduced which broke this package it seems. -- ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://krosos.org/dist/keys/ https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org