On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:56:04 +1000 Ben Woodcroft wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the patches. > > > On 25/09/17 03:17, Christopher Baines wrote: > > * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-httpclient): New variable. > > --- > > gnu/packages/ruby.scm | 51 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, > > 51 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm b/gnu/packages/ruby.scm > > index 80d3bffd8..ff6be875f 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/ruby.scm > > @@ -3579,6 +3579,57 @@ It has built-in support for the legacy > > @code{cookies.txt} and (home-page > > "https://github.com/sparklemotion/http-cookie") (license > > license:expat))) > > +(define-public ruby-httpclient > > + (package > > + (name "ruby-httpclient") > > + (version "2.8.3") > > + (source > > + (origin > > + (method url-fetch) > > + (uri (rubygems-uri "httpclient" version)) > > + (sha256 > > + (base32 > > + "19mxmvghp7ki3klsxwrlwr431li7hm1lczhhj8z4qihl2acy8l99")))) > > + (build-system ruby-build-system) > > + (arguments > > + '(;; TODO: Some tests currently fail > > + ;; ------ > > + ;; 211 tests, 729 assertions, 13 failures, 4 errors, 0 > > pendings, > > + ;; 2 omissions, 0 notifications > > + ;; 91.866% passed > > + ;; ------ > > + ;; 6.49 tests/s, 22.41 assertions/s > > + #:tests? #f > > + #:phases > > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > > + (replace 'check > > + (lambda* (#:key tests? #:allow-other-keys) > > + (if tests? > > + (zero? > > + (system* "ruby" > > + "-Ilib" > > + "test/runner.rb")) > > + #t))) > Since tests? is #f, this is effectively dead code. But it could be > useful to someone continuing the tests, I'm not fussed. I'm keen to keep it, as the #:tests? #f has a TODO comment, maybe the tests can be made to pass in the future. > > + (add-after 'install 'wrap-bin-httpclient > > + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys) > > + (wrap-program (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "out") > > + "/bin/httpclient") > > + `("GEM_HOME" ":" prefix (,(getenv "GEM_HOME")))) > > + #t))))) > It would be preferable to move this to be part of the > ruby-build-system as is done in e.g. python-build-system, but OK. Agreed, I'll try and make some time to look at this.