From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhiOi-0001w5-O3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:25:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhiOc-000124-VQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:25:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59094) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhiOc-00011w-OS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:25:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dhiOc-0003EC-JR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:25:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28093] [PATCH] gnu: cgit: Don't build cgit's special 'git:src' input. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 16:24:40 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170815202440.GA13279@jasmine.lan> References: <20170815073531.4b72ab02@cbaines.net> <20170815192136.GB9893@jasmine.lan> <87valozixh.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87valozixh.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 28093@debbugs.gnu.org --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:15:38PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > cgit was not affected by the failing git@2.10 package since it only uses > the *source* derivation. It does not care about what's going on in > git's [arguments]. :-) Ah, that's right. > So this patch won't change anything from cgits perspective. I'm > slightly in favor of keeping git@2.10 until it's really uneeded (awkward > if we have to add it back later), but no strong opinion either way. >=20 > I would probably have done this instead of disabling tests if I had > thought about it. This change won't make a measurable difference to Hydra's workload, but I'd still like to avoid building this package unnecessarily. --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlmTWIUACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjU4w//TE51+bup3euj4HxWK+60ViOvYV8NiQaVbvtBAta5kXq7/r3Q6slGp/Lw fohelFwPS3bVupJz9MjdN4wLksKlGMLsN2jaxaihzI/dkldvwnpUIgwYxkIoCnUZ wbHkeKpIshfcJFx+ZU+6rHlcXKREVb+Zt4v/e1Fce09LMvtX4AOZZIA3Wu7NKMzf /nWLJTebLRMLUpVLo0Te11yw6/6d5FPT0P4QfwGbItrhtHxMALkTceXG1N1NIFBx IHP49zyKD24WZIm5cW33HLUPPEVIJ0F1xftiN0QTqlX7Ba5otjpySRcSv76tjz4Y UOlC45juP0SxBFcCnYBj0EdyJQLet8zXbGl0GlRsc3tpAQAl02U/Bb+wKZ0m8zXL JRXuxAT7wk3MwVYEWN5S3H9JVPFOLuMHKP/RvkCq61aDxS54novvCel1Sj35iwHr NZ2H52uQwDrUW6FYTLRLx1Mr6fcMUF+QKDPyEg9LrxO30ja3440OW6zMZAVAJ5qf M5C9mgsUqaHomk8XwxGQuXXo6SjYbFnrbVB2k5uMPuWdE+4lP23y/nRvqCr15VNL nRiQf0OxjBxbrIg746sz7KutEfxfdEDXq5R089epkMDr31AG2y/gdD60F4BFOgYQ tNFAZpqKthhoZU91UIR+7ix7SUf0hBfj1m3sNcUAbovNIqNi2V4= =Fe4N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--