From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dceTR-0002bd-QI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:13:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dceTO-0003pS-Jr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:13:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34693) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dceTO-0003pM-F4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:13:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dceTN-0004x1-TJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:13:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27909] Replace keepassx with keepassxc Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 17:12:39 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170801211239.GA5844@jasmine.lan> References: <20170801150815.GJ2406@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170801194319.GA31810@jasmine.lan> <20170801201150.GQ2406@macbook42.flashner.co.il> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170801201150.GQ2406@macbook42.flashner.co.il> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 27909@debbugs.gnu.org --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:11:50PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:43:19PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > The last keepassx release was in October 2016. That's not *that* long > > unless there are some serious bugs in the program. >=20 > The maintainer is MIA. I'm not aware of serious bugs, other than it > still relying on Qt-4. Ah, still using Qt-4 is my pet peeve! :) That means it will have to be removed sooner or later. > > Are other distros replacing keepassx? > >=20 >=20 > I don't believe Debian is, but there is active work on packaging > keepassxc. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D855173 >=20 > > Is keepassxc a "seamless" replacement for keepassx, or would users maybe > > have to adjust somehow? >=20 > It is supposed to be a seamless replacement, using the same .kdbx files > as keepassx. Okay, I'll defer to what others think, especially since I'm not using keepass*. --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlmA7sMACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi2aw/9FxzVwlkO6IOC1hYHZiFr3bATBdiI1V2FPZ4vpq6PSkeXPBZTjIopGZwE XBFqcbHASkJhbBM7XqiTaDEJWfAp4YrZZrAe7IMq0R10PST8lJiwV+yHsZ6b06GG F2YgQIf5XLftiNV3Y4hLCJTE0wZlOY368Y65HtreKNAqRTtuGOVriw9W88+IUCEB zJBLv8WpaOs/3GjepOf7MFuj4MDQxm/tQHJYCzw9zlobVTbPEex46hg4FTdihl33 HW9pdmuL5w+2g5SarGQA/ZLSUqnbVBzsSGt2dGpZ9EXb27UrndvgznJa5mwc9btz Re0/aqlOEZ+9qGFuqZJdJk8qrGMxks3ZbH2OvMn9fiLIq9pTuCGHmWSE9pUDD0Mt JR+AZ5avmOqwEK2X7yejjgBaqIRfeWsfx6S/KPcWKc+HnhQtnmXYlIHPp10JhqyF pbDgypBVIH+OCjxzyCWAZ5orHEGp6+5QB7h4apryEgIOzhkCX0AIiAzaFLhoBVbf 3SUP5raljEIHtENX9/g3sd2gVyCth1L4K6GKenhwV2njYOnWYic1/lN3K48PR557 DVBt3yGwuImdjSvwprR62cnY/9ASuq0nft2/szxk8638a6GxXv8Gb9Fg+/eVl0ZF vYNJHP0W8yo5padRCv0BVuZGpPDoKwkn9tCd7IZYs1VTi2kNUS4= =wjSn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--