From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dW2HE-0006BE-9x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:13:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dW2H8-0001ix-EU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:13:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dW2H8-0001id-3c for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:13:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dW2H7-0006nH-RG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:13:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27673] Failing tests Resent-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:12:21 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170714151221.GA5467@jasmine.lan> References: <20170712204731.14463-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <52c335a3.AEQANFFEJwgAAAAAAAAAAAPNhpIAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZaLFC@mailjet.com> <87zic72ko9.fsf@gmail.com> <49cfd80f.ADkAACRSNMIAAAAAAAAAAAPVUpsAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZaNEd@mailjet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49cfd80f.ADkAACRSNMIAAAAAAAAAAAPVUpsAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZaNEd@mailjet.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 27673@debbugs.gnu.org --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 07:41:25PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote: >=20 > Oleg Pykhalov writes: >=20 > > Arun Isaac writes: > >> Could you also package the tests? You'll need something very similar to > >> what the emacs-which-key package has. > > > > Sure, but they fails :-) >=20 > Sure, we'll ditch the tests. Could you just send me an updated patch > with the new description? Do the test failures indicate a real problem with the package? Or are they spurious? Should we report them upstream? --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAllo31UACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiD5hAA56kpWD4ZbHfSJFp7X3ocUnoe8nvoZ8HLNj2EdiMcxb9nb/TR3+FeXT28 rLfMNsyUApaotv9429a0JfBiR0ccwbsjzJLOitJTKadcEzyjfPoyn4Fz4pv6oBo2 zyrQUIuq4iCk4Qv53nourWj2ihQAn5UBAeXwjCTTGi4URkKChSG7cqyBfmcACMPD 260qysoOxenlNIfakMI/+M5tJtblENvOoN5pU9gQJgou5JjgoRojMde3HV/6Q50M E2e2Ru3DdnjAxu2NHJ51X1x8XpgP29XRioVSbH2UR0lrjr6ZDMbmUyBsDbFPkbOK jgP/vUcWjkRZ8Pq+dI6uDi1CklGjbcDHzjK+8QctHnHGWihL/0pF+a5iZHs1qkXQ 0UxTuKLRwAaCI+qMNYCLRjP790LuZG7nTu3Z5ybCM/ov6fNZPPZSPWkWnJ6sUp0s w5K8GJMoDoGS3gpdm84wrqjfadUdygeeFlyQnDgPr/aR0yOsAwBGBtmF6yLQNz6x TCHMsmOyVZGFTTntguRk4WuLhuJQnqVVns2g0yTwBPlAblgaHqsOi/FKx0YbgWoZ 1w2zBrCIfvjwUECXml9zfxqlMKCcrBp4VvNW+TdJ5EWzSV7azeU+NgGm2SDqyCXT 6YMh4rMd5WGc0Z3QRAlKrOm/IjwUFUg5DiuvGKjF0sKrHCbvO3M= =JyoF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--