From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgR1-00013r-Vo for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:53:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgQx-0002en-2Z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:53:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgQw-0002eg-V0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:53:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgQw-0008U8-O7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:53:02 -0400 Subject: bug#27524: [PATCH] gnu: poppler: Fix CVE-2017-{9775,9776}. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:51:49 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170629205149.GA19238@jasmine.lan> References: <3a94d64e80c9ddc69ce334ad823a7dbd7ec7fd8f.1498720891.git.leo@famulari.name> <87k23ulqls.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k23ulqls.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27524-done@debbugs.gnu.org --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 06:13:03PM +0200, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: >=20 > > * gnu/packages/pdf.scm (poppler)[replacement]: New field. > > (poppler-0.56.0): New variable. > > (poppler-qt4, poppler-qt5): Use 'package/inherit'. >=20 > LGTM! I assume 0.52.0 and 0.56.0 are ABI-compatible. Yes, they are ABI-compatible as far as I can tell. I tried cherry-picking the upstream patches but they don't apply cleanly to poppler 0.52.0, which I why I decided to use the updated poppler as the replacement. Thanks for the review! Pushed as 95bbaa02aa63bc5eae36f686f1ed9915663aa4cf. --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAllVaGUACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhPmg/+Iv3h465DFI92rqLrtzVheVp27CpOUTpJo83kgAwxdDcOTptjskuSKmcI ZeXDmfViRptqS/75unGw/64Js2sGfUhLCt5MZ7ZTPX91pCsrBu8Juzv5znIZMVBF ADCKO3mxFP8UvVE/baVoI5RhRvtOnIqvC4ZMLJjFnYBAoQZwWEPkAP/3Z8WjUiDu 3TTOsSYwHLtLGNcd/4PnL9yaxisltwIRaU4OYq8cmGD5gGjgLnXoARqno4U4lALd JmGbs+DRcnvyByJpjYmz/oXkFJpg7O+EPwKgM9+4JakoXuKtFdcc288JpUcDdsab r1KRW61q1rw3RRHnVYFkET2L+30nqbcVyd4RyZQIOLnI78lMRR8tlicTYR7FmSCd JfnS9ac5FWPMc5BHQyYCCJ80UszDZVVxmCjDUwHYOv6mKuNOLAZabjFETmvPjgx4 uWGJHanv/WGxf8IreXeW2NwgU+XnKEohtU+t+KC4gH6h6ZEhHaYAPJHFoGF6zB/5 7kz8VcYyvOvPK0caVRzN/t+fe4B+D9QEccwZS+LuA66SjTWM6vXRVeLscB6p+sdG +YvxUrRI5YGhPd32xOAYD/d7SqgD6xK2jXQEZXbzEXcncC4HdlmvU+VgXa7xsVaW d/DuQ4BKY4zvoTcV73JlyTDsx/K2eQD0WfxScxp99f/iTj5hZAc= =P/o2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--