From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIgVv-00067I-Ql for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 15:21:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIgVs-0008Dw-JM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 15:21:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIgVq-0008Do-6V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 15:21:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dIgVq-00075O-1Y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 15:21:02 -0400 Subject: bug#27250: [PATCH] gnu: crawl: Update to 0.20.0. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:20:17 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170607192017.GA6971@jasmine> References: <9de7211f-6ab6-7a7d-c2a9-ad65f95bbfe4@cock.li> <92906ae2.AEUAK6w8Z7gAAAAAAAAAAAPHYWoAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZNWdE@mailjet.com> <51e0342f.AEUAK9NcTPcAAAAAAAAAAAO0_XAAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZNmdv@mailjet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 27250@debbugs.gnu.org --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:54:31PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote: >=20 > > I ran the build 9 times trying to reproduce it, but every time all 29 > > tests succeeded. I'm building on x86_64 on GuixSD, using `./pre-inst-env > > guix build crawl --rounds=3D9` on the commit I sent in last. >=20 > I must admit I am mystified. I hope I didn't mess up somehow while > applying your patch. I will reapply your patch to a fresh branch and try > again. Meanwhile, could you rebase against the latest master, and try > building again? Maybe, a change to some other package breaks the crawl > tests. Another option is that the tests are affected by differences in the host kernel or filesystem. --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlk4Ue0ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhljA/9GcWc0aodxKIt8+zjoZDXykXMFGpxTrHjueLYwkM96aPyttc/ZVxz3Gju 81gldN19VoVTZczwsUg9MKvFYVi+eBpTvp0WpZ7f6kLsufxHapWgTe/eA4+w41cC nOCxvlou3+QHBJ8ccrBn4b4oEa40JXe0ezHcw92Ts3vYIP2F3ndOwgdArHkrrpJM UJRu56rbNUPINlQMp22DmIGZ1Hc+jhfhBCrkWcrYxWTCRl18astQzF3wi7dPNm6Y wFyncVIaPWx+RToFssAjTZO6KizEqi5IVjK91d/gTgW7CYc9eUFBvzQ23pwygHPF lcNspN+8d6RLGVLkJYwiWPx1V3IxEmtEdNjCnVBN1fjkTYpKFgBI4CmHJiImZWhG P3vf4JfIep6PQxLQzB+HT1yXAjgJ5FdYlYoHMokVbv3smlgJywu8h6nTgllks1cs prRC0yJV5frlgvJSddc0X6+cwppwymPUTmAd/8HnV3hPzSpw56ZsA37pHO1WdCTN E/xTdXbABFDq6twrWXxTTTMWX7oRsD5ReLD08dsAGi4zQywBR2E8Bq/eE72PDhcg Z7uN1l3Fr4vh5sqkKYpuZc/g3bTosn7AEKn5BTgbMF3ek2Z0iYdWfFwRBBFWORPg C7TCJtUKYiGqnOHQSagFD+XL177AjtbSTD0WfWE90/Z0Y/xdR7s= =PDnE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--