From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFRVM-0007Z7-Qw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 16:43:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFRVH-0002sZ-Ur for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 16:43:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFRVG-0002rJ-P9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 16:43:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dFRVG-0000Yj-Il for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2017 16:43:02 -0400 Subject: bug#27110: [PATCH] gnu: asciinema: Update to 1.4.0. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 16:42:26 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170529204226.GB15019@jasmine> References: <1495934193.2882278.990671576.787F34D9@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1519f8c5.AEUAKk_HotIAAAAAAAAAAAPFk78AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZKwI9@mailjet.com> <20170528183753.GB15883@jasmine> <2dff1be8.ADsAAhu0Cj4AAAAAAAAAAAO8ccgAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZK0zP@mailjet.com> <20170528223323.GA15181@jasmine> <877f10fuwp.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ftEhullJWpWg/VHq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: Alex Griffin , 27110-done@debbugs.gnu.org --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:53:04AM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote: > In general, for the typical python library/package (published both on > pypi and github), should we prefer the pypi tarball or the original > upstream github tarball? WDYT? In my experience, it seems like the PyPi tarballs are what the upstream projects want distributors to use. However, as Marius pointed out, sometimes the upstream projects choose not to distribute their tests on PyPi, and in that case I like to use whichever release has tests, since the tests help us be sure that our packaging works. So, I usually use what's on PyPi, but it depends. --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlksh64ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhN+RAA5dxxO6753EyvoJWui5a5aUWUi6L7hSADksl/A9TGoYTcKZ2So4ReXiGs WFXDGQaasf4rfRdoZVqTy5r9KCc1OcRzArAnzLc+CwoFLe8FB5TvvmwT0WE06366 ZXH/jajv8WbYEfrRAFxQBoEBrmn28otxPIiy/lYbhcSItNquQaaM0Tisd3PAZuYO xf2V16puYT6u9dRGSnPZ7RVwFa29Niw/lnMN6oqkUCaX5eUYd2IOcUgT5vKRIgmD 96oHS8RT3rm5nD6D7j+DBhuNhlMQgOoKVtMeTIQBZm4xrJjEiLAW7slwJ07GbZDw XzWA8iXFQuqAcPZ3ADJgyJ+iDlvljbB4gHHAQO1WloDz4PbZIS5fRQEtndz20rRO tviB+90NonlrGeBJbkfEQAJORggR0W5x7yfWz32+sorpWTuUuYniHtOz8XrT02Yn V7TubCkC/8xgY3tgcZEGiLi9dqh8Nv58bPypmaZAKsdwPqgsmTWq9a286zF9duEE 3VNHczdVSD73d9974EpmKTlyHKnejoVtvbMz5y8tDed0W/NyLNqowUi/j6ZobxV7 Nw1HDJOAb2GR6FAYviFBTpqbKWFNZh7QErVt2xalhKPlOeLUX4H9KLuW2QmWWD91 Rq9Yyi44tQDgyJFhz5l49DRGf8G9C4TGHOkLASqXsLWOdZQIleg= =+IS+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq--