From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9PPS-00078u-0c for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 01:16:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9PPO-00060h-SU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 01:16:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9PPO-0005zj-CK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 01:16:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9PPN-0008HF-R4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 01:16:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26875: Non-graphical (and other types) of GRUB interfaces Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 01:15:43 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170513051543.GA24917@jasmine> References: <20170511073626.GA4698@jasmine> <20170511074636.pupingletbo6b3a7@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170511074636.pupingletbo6b3a7@abyayala> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 26875@debbugs.gnu.org On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 07:46:36AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Without testing it, this looks like it could fix the use of GuixSD > on IN-Berlin e.V. servers. At least the options are given, like > talked about in a level above this subthread. It works in QEMU, so hopefully it will work on VPS providers like IN-Berlin. I'm sending version 2 of the patch. It fixes a texinfo syntax error in the manual that I added just before sending the earlier patch.