From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uIH-0007Q5-EY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:14:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uIE-0002vH-7N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:14:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uIE-0002vA-3Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:14:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d4uID-0000Tt-Ry for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:14:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26713: [PATCH] gnu: Move netsurf to web-browsers.scm. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:13:06 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170430191306.GA26169@jasmine> References: <20170429220942.26880-1-kei@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170429220942.26880-1-kei@openmailbox.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: 26713@debbugs.gnu.org --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 06:09:42PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: > * gnu/packages/web.scm: Move netsurf... > * gnu/packages/web-browsers.scm: ...here. This caused building Guix to fail because the glib-or-gtk build-system module was not imported in (gnu packages web-browsers). I planned to add that module in a followup commit, but I realized that several other variables from (gnu packages web) need to be imported in (gnu packages web-browsers) along with this change, and I decided to revert the change for now. Can you take another look at moving this package? --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlkGN0EACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhpiA//bX2D77bPJ6gGejbk/a7g2kp7o7SeQS9UGtLOxlwQejR9C6YDmLNVqZKJ lMg8FwXkrEm7vDgjZ1cx/Tfkte3MwbpnfcadXk/JgPTiSQw1wiEUUUvNR+VgUyxC v0y61wh+sGMgAcaRMHOm7B3GjOEfU7DyPDVEzYjdjaxYzzyIw6yMiIIo6y/f0Dqg JSGkcXoJ0xYRkmBOHe8SqbmaNINqb2mlTHnTr8P8icQ+9DB1kgaFkmCiVfyWD5Wd Zu+vBzM3FIon0A5ms6AjI39kYeZdWHkSP/BD0Qu59AAWhJvAiNJbVy5nTjUpl7vz KvFegV7OawvWqpqo6hexECFV6N0WX4hQjQQHlOHyVfbmZ2B39UcDvbWhWuWKDmuD 3DTCzhkUSfr25sH4AjU6d7ejasYp8yNsfw1mBCaQr5sD1bThBAjLtTvMaA/55kp1 UArFCjviEuATrjYHpcySny7wjSeXAOnUkQFeRxm759G8YTewL2uPv/g6VzBwA+nV KEYEjHGnQphKpn3OAVCITeYCpt8cHPbe5z47yx4dIhz+0TsrGWYEkO+PwvJiB4bi YCs9jwgu2JMdnOzEbzNY8SXyO0yJBjbm5jQPTtLMJuvC9Km66DD3ZxFDJI1Oj7Cj FwzApUWVwVdkRmstiJIaYVumFhfh1LxtSPqpcjQCHOMBSI3qims= =SwyE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--