From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58467) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0F0B-0007Q8-83 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:20:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0F07-0004fr-B2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:20:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0F07-0004fl-43 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:20:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0F06-0004YQ-Vr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:20:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26548: [PATCH] install: Enable SSH in installation image. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 22:19:11 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170417221911.yh3mqezjeoosyt63@abyayala> References: <20170417213030.1489-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <20170417215416.GB32573@jasmine> <87vaq2k7sw.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vaq2k7sw.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 26548@debbugs.gnu.org Marius Bakke transcribed 1.5K bytes: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:30:30PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > >> Hi Guix! This patch adds an SSH server to the installation image > >> to aid remote installations as requested in > >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2017-01/msg00047.html > >> > >> lsh-service depends on networking, so I pulled in a DHCP client too. > >> It increases the image size by about 29MiB. > >> > >> * gnu/system/install.scm (%installation-services): Add DHCP-CLIENT-SERVICE > >> and LSH-SERVICE. > > > > I wonder, did you consider using OpenSSH instead? Are there any > > advantages to using lsh here? > > I chose lsh mostly because I thought the GNU live image should use the > GNU ssh implementation. For the intended usage (logging in once with a > password to complete the installation), there is no difference to the > end user. No strong opinion though :-) Uhm, didn't we choose to default to OpenSSH in the config? Why should the installation image differ? There were good reasons against lsh mentioned in the thread. -- PGP and more: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/