From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id xim+Fgnhw1+7IAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 17:57:29 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 8LMrEgnhw181LAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 17:57:29 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F185294011A for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 17:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46198 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjQwx-00087k-Vk for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:57:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjQwb-00087K-Fj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:57:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjQwY-0002PX-9Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:57:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjQwY-0006RK-8W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44077] gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.4. Resent-From: Tanguy LE CARROUR Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 17:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44077 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: 44077@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44077-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44077.160667259724721 (code B ref 44077); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 17:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 44077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 17:56:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52526 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjQw9-0006Qf-Eo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:56:37 -0500 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:33513) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjQw7-0006QP-A4 for 44077@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:56:36 -0500 Received: from localhost (static-176-185-184-238.ftth.abo.bbox.fr [176.185.184.238]) (Authenticated sender: tanguy@bioneland.org) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11CB310000F; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 17:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 18:56:25 +0100 From: Tanguy LE CARROUR References: <20201126133621.bnjr7g5p3rjndr2n@melmoth> <87mtz2tv49.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <1606572132.b3t9ih4lho.astroid@melmoth.none> <874kl9trol.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> In-Reply-To: <874kl9trol.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1606671968.b6x1phkual.astroid@melmoth.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.28 X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-TUID: jVhYjZwzo1Zq Hi! Excerpts from Nicolas Goaziou's message of November 28, 2020 4:41 pm: > Tanguy LE CARROUR writes: >=20 >> Would have it been better for me to submit separate patches, as they are >> not really specific to Poetry, and wait for them to be merged before >> submitting a patch set with only `poetry-core` and `poetry`? >=20 > The sole "problematic" patch is the one updating python-distlib, in the > sense that it cannot be applied in the same branch as the others (unless > everything goes into core-updates, of course). >=20 > If you can split the set into independent parts, i.e., if you don't > really need to update python-distlib prior to updating Poetry, we can > process it differently. I'm working on it! But it's apparently rebuilding the World, which is reall= y slow on my computer at home! :-( >> The process is not yet clear to me. Out of sheer curiosity=E2=80=A6 can = someone object >> to a merge in master? Who would that be? >=20 > Per (info "(guix) Submitting Patches"), packages with more than 1800 > dependent packages, as is the case with python-distlib, are updated in > the "core-updates" branch. If I apply it on master branch, it will be > reverted presto by another commiter. >=20 > Does that make sense? It's the last part that I still cannot figure out how it happens: "it will be reverted presto by another commiter". It's not the "why", it the "how"! Are each commit on the master branch monitored for quality/conformity?! Thanks to Chris's email, I've justed discovered Patchwork. Is it were the "magic" happens?! Regards, --=20 Tanguy