From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id WMqYCLpawl8DLgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:12:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id oG5qBLpawl+kXAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:12:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAC759402C8 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45024 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj0xM-0006ZQ-Qu for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:12:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj0xG-0006ZI-Ah for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:12:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj0xG-0007yR-3c for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:12:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj0xF-0008G4-V6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:12:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44077] gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.4. Resent-From: Tanguy LE CARROUR Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44077 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: 44077@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44077-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44077.160657272031736 (code B ref 44077); Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:12:01 +0000 Received: (at 44077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2020 14:12:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47179 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj0xE-0008Fn-3G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:12:00 -0500 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:37347) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kj0xB-0008FY-1m for 44077@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 09:11:58 -0500 Received: from localhost (static-176-185-184-238.ftth.abo.bbox.fr [176.185.184.238]) (Authenticated sender: tanguy@bioneland.org) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1895110000D; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 14:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 15:11:47 +0100 From: Tanguy LE CARROUR References: <20201126133621.bnjr7g5p3rjndr2n@melmoth> <87mtz2tv49.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> In-Reply-To: <87mtz2tv49.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1606572132.b3t9ih4lho.astroid@melmoth.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.27 X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-TUID: oEZVHEDJJL/8 Hi Nicolas, Excerpts from Nicolas Goaziou's message of November 27, 2020 9:14 pm: > Tanguy Le Carrour writes: >=20 >> Sorry to ask you this, but not knowing exactly how the code review works= , >> I just wanted to know if my patch hadn't fallen into oblivion. >=20 > Well, it had, indeed=E2=80=A6 =3D/ No problem! ;-) I should consider myself lucky to have someone reviewing my patch on his spare time! =E2=80=A6 all the more so I might be the only person using Poet= ry! ^_^' > I looked at it again, and it LGTM. However python-distlib has a lot of > dependents, so it needs to be applied on core-updates branch. Would have it been better for me to submit separate patches, as they are not really specific to Poetry, and wait for them to be merged before submitting a patch set with only `poetry-core` and `poetry`? > If there is no objection, I'll do that soon. The process is not yet clear to me. Out of sheer curiosity=E2=80=A6 can som= eone object to a merge in master? Who would that be? Thanks again for your help and your time! --=20 Tanguy