From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id OLQFGHjYK2IdcwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 00:17:12 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id 1zzZEHjYK2JhkQAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 00:17:12 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE21416714 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 00:17:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57908 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nSoVS-0006qw-Oy for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:17:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nSoVK-0006qX-Mr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:17:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44794) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nSoVK-0004iS-24 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:17:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nSoVJ-0000Qv-Ub for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:17:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#54304] [PATCH] Don't fix git executable location during Elixir build Resent-From: Maxime Devos Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 23:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54304 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Cees de Groot , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 54304@debbugs.gnu.org, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Received: via spool by 54304-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54304.16470405921623 (code B ref 54304); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 23:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 54304) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Mar 2022 23:16:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38691 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nSoUq-0000Q6-6b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:16:32 -0500 Received: from laurent.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.89]:54306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nSoUo-0000Pw-2q for 54304@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:16:31 -0500 Received: from [172.20.10.5] ([188.188.45.72]) by laurent.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id 5BGS2700K1ZSGwU01BGTMR; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 00:16:28 +0100 Message-ID: <13042012c34522fc9ed26746d11cc88b22f1ec6a.camel@telenet.be> From: Maxime Devos Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 00:16:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <3FC21903-C19B-49C1-B865-7D15E1B3EC74@tobias.gr> <2D451842-1953-44AE-A6E8-B50EC77A26A0@tobias.gr> <_Zczh2RFJMdo3Xxkpzzzfq2LT3_PlZVB2huEPbAOcMoPnxeZWSZD7_BJfMZewYiM_LRQk4y6ScvTx_M7L-JQau-5IDMIe9G-req83waeb5o=@evrl.com> <87wnh0w41s.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <3772387f64195fabd6d4a69a4d29912e43896ba9.camel@telenet.be> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hNPcfrOiY2bT6aO645MV" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1647040588; bh=lI0CyoF7r5drNMzgFzJ+5UhsafvZ6oPlkQsLPRN3eCo=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=g+f+kuAUBm78n1OEi6itsy+rizzAXGr0hf62JY+luLFteqe3knbWYtXpkk7iRGeqe xcHDOTMaRxenz89qX8cGzSZzuQ+xmu1nMFJ+WVfpBnKacrml+NR/AuxLIcIqZHOV8E 9qx+jj5B58OsErjEo7WJY3uVPhNdc5+9a9jVZzq5N/NmHkQNDIbR6ySgEu5NqEHEES 3OWmOrOazOxHXcKD10eSjI/w86pyDmk8M9BsWRzhmNYjV/+K7VCKsziTUgTTqUiD9c 1Kvl+UfdyOUam+maxJxM4s24joaEOqCSHAZp+xaGjhK/KePg0rg8/FsGZU+tv+Y8CT aiLyyykgLOyag== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1647040631; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=lI0CyoF7r5drNMzgFzJ+5UhsafvZ6oPlkQsLPRN3eCo=; b=js4ITty3McpeoyszBGYKi9vn2NzRScE8GUCAY/ajSHmW72hHPxjQ4O7Gj/RyNCGr/kyIeQ jP1SBxnHij9gsKBrLl2Au1uTO+QfhKDcX8/3TXhP8ePacDWWYyU831zcC7wdO/93bMgy80 98Q1vpJp/YeFPZa9Nlk5JyINh6TPdtX+DQukxJzIT/b9ftGRgyb7I8n9gKNgUdXIQ5E8Vf eRAN9n4xJST2tx71lBk1fdr3lmqe3xVz4LqfV2qW+LUlezZu9q6zmd+kLY3YPHynkPDkJb 1gzKhiLarFB/nCgSnp+mv9xQOugsv12lVM6Brmx3j2Exf68QOOvg34qleMqp3g== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1647040631; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QqNhXDGDofv5Zt74Ay/vQHKrWafKSOGp/f1QAamuZ925UTREoabvMS66yrzBwUFfw3EJfj 9r7M4r409l9UUE/YZLszzFv9wRaRJ/a+M97aWVPqGl4cTFceNWPYdjrAtsK5+wG+me4sJI QBm/piJnZD99kcceViJS7hFUQwuzpKkaD8NrTDujgm4teB0IKNogKMG0++/DRXlwJRGWb+ hkwPN0fe9RcIah6x9xeIcIiyZxsipA439bPDpNVUwdpVendiZqSe02rxKSeLnmFbAyAdvt vcOv7T78q1LpBbzTTsbzrIcjhPqlBff6apig8QLhCgBK/29kExnsWJ99VIgERw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=telenet.be header.s=r22 header.b=g+f+kuAU; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=telenet.be (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 2.21 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=telenet.be header.s=r22 header.b=g+f+kuAU; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=telenet.be (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BE21416714 X-Spam-Score: 2.21 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: VH5M1pHkjcVi --=-hNPcfrOiY2bT6aO645MV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cees de Groot schreef op vr 11-03-2022 om 22:36 [+0000]: > Well, feel free to do the patching work. I'm just here reviewing things, looking for possible better alternatives, etc. > Realize that you are going to do work for a) a very small group of > developers (Elixir is a small language and Guix isn=E2=80=99t hardly a wi= dely > spread system to begin with), b) a subset of those that need git > dependencies, and c) a subset of _those_ that need these dependencies > on a project source tree that itself was not checked out with git > (otherwise the git executable will already be in the environment and > everything will work).=C2=A0 >=20 > Please let me know when you found that unicorn developer :) a) You're an Elixir developer, using Guix, and doing packaging work for Elixir in Guix. Also, how is the popularity of Guix relevant on guix-patches@, and how is the popularity of Elixir relevant when this whole patch is about improving the Elixir package? b) does not seem relevant to me, see other e-mails (about removing a feature not worth the decrease in closure size IMO, and about non-git references) c) It's a bit niche; it would be a very nice thing of Guix to support that niche. Also, being checked out with git does not imply that git is in the environment, it's possible to first set up a git repository and later enter a pure environment for development (guix shell -- pure elixir elixir-foo elixir-bar). I often do this (not with elixir, but with some other packages). TBC, what do you mean with =E2=80=98unicorn developer=E2=80=99 here? a) someone implementing this b) someone in the subset If (a), I was kind of hinting that you seem to be in a perfect position to do so (you're an Elixir developer (*) in Guix and you seem to have some knowledge of the serialisation formats). (*) I'm assuming "Elixir developer" =3D "a developer of the Elixir implementation" here. > If Guix ever gets elixir packages, that can be tackled.=20 >=20 > I=E2=80=99m bowing out of this discussion. If my patch gets accepted then= all > good, if not, I=E2=80=99ll move it to my private channel and keep being h= appy > there.=20 Ok, but I'm a bit confused on why you don't seem interested in fixing the reference issue and why you write =E2=80=98ever=E2=80=99 instead of =E2= =80=98when=E2=80=99 because you're both an Elixir and Guix developer. (You don't have to answer, not answering is fine.) Greetings, Maxime. --=-hNPcfrOiY2bT6aO645MV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYivYQhccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7l3pAQDQwm2ZyoKQ5RwJUKB38BiFqHpQ lV7TpJEJISOeZnbNhwD+Nvvh7Lt2vxvygcOF4aB+BnkaYEDSqNpRr8N7WiDgMAE= =riV4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hNPcfrOiY2bT6aO645MV--