From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibs2B-0000O9-NX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 15:11:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibs2A-0006cF-O1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 15:11:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibs2A-0006c3-L2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 15:11:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibs2A-000797-Dy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 15:11:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38459] [PATCH] gnu: (cross-gcc-arguments|gcc-boot0): Enable 128 bit long double for POWER9. Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibrua-000620-Su for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 15:03:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibruZ-0003H0-RL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 15:03:12 -0500 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr ([2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]:6845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibruY-0003Dz-8m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 15:03:11 -0500 Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e0a:2a2:1590:3130:d4af:7a6d:562c] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:2a2:1590:3130:d4af:7a6d:562c]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E557313F8C8 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:03:06 +0100 (CET) References: <9d5aee30-1cfe-434b-f191-3bbd06caa319@free.fr> <87h82its9y.fsf@nckx> From: dftxbs3e Message-ID: <0e9bb696-0165-82c8-799b-58ae72e382cc@free.fr> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:03:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87h82its9y.fsf@nckx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 38459@debbugs.gnu.org Yes, it should certainly be guarded by an if to avoid breaking other=20 platforms, even if it shouldnt hurt much. Issue is I do not know Scheme enough to figure out the syntax for an=20 inline if like that. So I would appreciate if you could help me on that? On 12/2/19 8:57 PM, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via wrote: > dftxbs3e, > > dftxbs3e =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> This is to be applied against core-updates and fixes: >> >> $ guix build --target=3Dpowerpc64le-linux-gnu bootstrap-tarballs > > Thanks for sending this in!=C2=A0 I'll be sure to merge it if no one el= se=20 > has objections. > > I'm really not familiar with this part of Guix, though.=C2=A0 I'd naive= ly=20 > expect this to be guarded with an (if =E2=80=A6) so it only applies to = POWER.=C2=A0=20 > (Why) is that not possible or desirable? > > Kind regards, > > T G-R