From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoQaR-0003kL-RO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 06:58:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hoQaQ-0001eh-RW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 06:58:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hoQaQ-0001eL-Ns for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 06:58:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoQaQ-0000Nx-JU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 06:58:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#36695] [PATCH 3/3] guix: ant-build-system: Use absolute path as base-dir. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:57:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <560f89f5-c186-9a93-ac3a-b5ca92f5842e@crazy-compilers.com> References: <20190716201020.3303-1-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <20190716201020.3303-3-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <01413BEF-14AB-466F-8329-D81C0BB592FA@lepiller.eu> <560f89f5-c186-9a93-ac3a-b5ca92f5842e@crazy-compilers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <09595D0B-D7E7-44DF-855F-E2EE322B8C87@lepiller.eu> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Hartmut Goebel , 36695@debbugs.gnu.org Le 19 juillet 2019 12:43:50 GMT+02:00, Hartmut Goebel a =C3=A9crit : >Am 17=2E07=2E19 um 10:17 schrieb Julien Lepiller: >> I don't understand the point of that patch=2E I can already add a chdir >phase just after unpack to do just that=2E What does this patch give us? > >This patch only ensures the build-directory is an absolute path instead >of a relative one=2E It does not enable to specify the build-dir as an >option to the ant-build-system=2E Thus it is different from using a chdir >phase=2E > >As this patch is some years old now, I can't remember the exact case=2E >AFAIR the relative path did not work for some packages for some reason=2E > >Please let me know if I should include this one, too=2E (No reasoning >necessary=2E) > >(I'm just waiting for your answer to avoid rebuilding all java-packages >twice - even on staging) I'm fine with this patch, but I still don't see the point=2E