Antero, Thank you for your effort in this review. On Tue, 2023-03-21 at 18:53 +0000, Antero Mejr wrote: > > > > Guix usually assumes `SSE2` capabilities for x86_64 targets, iirc. > > It does, but not for i386 to i686, which also often see sse2 flags in > > build systems. > > I did some benchmarks on a few workloads with millions of terms. The > "tunable" optimizations didn't consistently improve the > performance. Sometimes it would be a couple percent faster, sometimes > slower. So I didn't mark the package as tunable. I was watching my system load while `parform` was running its tests, and things did not seem compute bound, so the package being not tunable seems fine to me. > > > I used the other homepage so people can skip the weird "license > > > agreement" page at https://www.nikhef.nl/~form/. > > Calling the GPL a license agreement is weird, and it doesn't help that > > https://www.nikhef.nl/~form/maindir/ also refers to it. Perhaps we can > > raise an issue about that upstream? > > I would prefer not to bother upstream further regarding the website, > since I already had to ask them to change an invalid license statement > in a file header (which they did). Version 1 of the GPL used the term "license agreement" when describing itself, so the phrasing is not *super* weird, just maybe a bit outdated. There are also plenty of free software projects, e.g. nodejs, that present users with an "accept this license agreement" prompt in their M$ installers. I've pushed these patches in 15ee08ebf23ea6bc5be9fa157889419aa079076a and 31bed61b8278d3736cc29055d60db068a1160071 with a small adjustment to appease `guix lint`: --- a/gnu/packages/algebra.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/algebra.scm @@ -1873,6 +1873,9 @@ (define-public form answers are returned in a textual mathematical representation. The size of the considered expressions in FORM is only limited by the available disk space and not by the available RAM.") + ;; XXX: Ignore this CVE to work around a name clash with the unrelated + ;; "neos/forms" package. + (properties '((lint-hidden-cve . ("CVE-2021-32697")))) ;; x86_64 only due to test failures on other platforms. ;; Developers say other platforms are not "tier 1" supported: ;; https://github.com/vermaseren/form/issues/426 Thanks again, `~Eric