From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: 27110-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Alex Griffin <a@ajgrf.com>
Subject: bug#27110: [PATCH] gnu: asciinema: Update to 1.4.0.
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 00:53:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07176684.AEAAKtByx2IAAAAAAAAAAAPFwJUAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZLHUl@mailjet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877f10fuwp.fsf@fastmail.com>
Marius Bakke writes:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>
>> My understanding is that project maintainers upload their releases to
>> PyPi, not that PyPi packages the release for them. Is that incorrect?
>
> This is true. The PyPi releases are often different from the raw
> sources, look for the magic lines "packages" and "package_data" in
> setup.py[0] to see what is included/excluded in the PyPi archive.
> Unfortunately some packages also exlude tests, in which case it's okay
> to use the upstream repository.
>
> Some projects provide PGP signatures on PyPi as well, which is great.
> Take matplotlib for example:
>
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/matplotlib (PGP signed tarball, 52MiB)
> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/releases (no signature, 51MiB)
>
> [0] https://packaging.python.org/distributing/
In general, for the typical python library/package (published both on
pypi and github), should we prefer the pypi tarball or the original
upstream github tarball? WDYT?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-29 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-28 1:16 bug#27110: [PATCH] gnu: asciinema: Update to 1.4.0 Alex Griffin
2017-05-28 17:00 ` Arun Isaac
2017-05-28 18:37 ` Leo Famulari
2017-05-28 22:18 ` Arun Isaac
[not found] ` <2dff1be8.ADsAAhu0Cj4AAAAAAAAAAAO8ccgAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZK0zP@mailjet.com>
2017-05-28 22:33 ` Leo Famulari
2017-05-28 23:01 ` Marius Bakke
2017-05-29 5:46 ` Arun Isaac
2017-05-29 17:26 ` Arun Isaac
2017-05-29 19:23 ` Arun Isaac [this message]
[not found] ` <a9d8e951.AEAAKtByx2QAAAAAAAAAAAO8ccgAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZLHUl@mailjet.com>
2017-05-29 20:42 ` Leo Famulari
2017-05-30 8:20 ` Arun Isaac
[not found] ` <be173c52.AEMAK1ybgp8AAAAAAAAAAAPFd4cAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZLStT@mailjet.com>
2017-05-30 15:10 ` Marius Bakke
2017-05-30 16:06 ` Arun Isaac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07176684.AEAAKtByx2IAAAAAAAAAAAPFwJUAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZLHUl@mailjet.com \
--to=arunisaac@systemreboot.net \
--cc=27110-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=a@ajgrf.com \
--cc=mbakke@fastmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).