From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 4OOhMENjdl9kFAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:16:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id jahpLENjdl8IZQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:16:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0069994023B for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 23:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46614 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kO7o8-0003zV-Oe for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 19:16:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kO7nu-0003zJ-Ly for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 19:16:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kO7nt-00057I-Ol for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 19:16:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kO7nt-0002Md-JN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 19:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#41143] [PATCH 1/2] mapped-devices: Allow target to be list of strings Resent-From: Mikhail Tsykalov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41143 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 41143@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 41143-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41143.16015941499067 (code B ref 41143); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:16:01 +0000 Received: (at 41143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2020 23:15:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38714 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kO7nh-0002MB-Gg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 19:15:49 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com ([209.85.208.194]:35885) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kO7nd-0002Lt-GF for 41143@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 19:15:48 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id r24so280776ljm.3 for <41143@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 16:15:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:cc:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=nHWnxfRZaIgoAg68PBwUBN5seyBc72VJQhK8SWKmawo=; b=XIjqv4/265od6YmHW1vzeHCEizUvBTnIP3mnj+/5Czy4xFDGMBfGgwmmqgHPw/EBYK vhFCTqpqpQ4F4MBGYZmlweDaQ4bq90yT7WbL6nb5jFk0JowtoDYiumaFge6u0wO6Gs6e FSMG8ScU422PembHPY8ls78qPgEIbS+zSiLXoAH9oIc+iXupFOKUaRuOLFQ+NiV0pUWn QQ9M+tsiM9s9gtrtBLfJnaVdi/sEUeLYBrwvrSU0lwR/pXPP2UImeIj4UqQ6Hrzp641Q Opmlz1ZuAMkK725kWoDZb3A2FvIHRBbmH4tTMe76lm/+kQGQns1d6Z8JONUPyxE4UQqk zl8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:cc:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=nHWnxfRZaIgoAg68PBwUBN5seyBc72VJQhK8SWKmawo=; b=rKWIcK3IofEzD4umargw+VRv/eM/Wyn6CO2L/Qj8SeUAIQPB4DewL1RolStS46XOgw tzSI1WuMx9bfhfrvRJbom3s939JzvHNr9SNszBxuadluAw3lN+lk8yhEpILi2dCT6IGQ siranbMUHVdYcmsudaGf/4Fxecr1Q193N+WV/KZ0x3s1N76Z1oHkFa2mdaQUyz+VFmbk mD8Ejhl0mpmd5oVkPmHrRaA3inpJyJjZjfrbsToDRV7chOyM1rpetULRe3Dv5PCL+Vry +5gSO+lUcKCQJ7sSlaTQlZiU9floMO0s0LzQCqsvhed+3gilTFYyKhx5AgwyMo1hgAkz Vp5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iYSpOHJ41u/fSZPDwabwo4SE2BLkTzOdUbY3sxJDFdiZW0Pse JXXkTx2kxnv9rt9ts9bgOtLkCuV51iQFWA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzf22eYw1cis4kTOAexSxfMriZy0Xolk30MrUE0Ry1T1+Hzz0vzagZ/GBL4i7P9XoJjA6KTaw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:920f:: with SMTP id k15mr3205263ljg.353.1601594138990; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.143] ([88.201.200.148]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t25sm596093ljk.71.2020.10.01.16.15.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT) References: <874ko6n0s5.fsf@gnu.org> <9ac560cc-8660-f034-c0d8-536b68d20f68@gmail.com> <87r1qq2o92.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn69j09o.fsf@gnu.org> From: Mikhail Tsykalov Message-ID: <02538eb3-f3cf-2783-b99a-15d77e2be546@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 02:15:37 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pn69j09o.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=XIjqv4/2; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: Qo7Kq06XBjrJ Hi, Hoping I didn't mess up too much with patches. System tests seem to be somewhat unstable and really long, but I think raid-root-os and encrypted-root-os pass. Somewhat unsure about adding "(srfi srfi-1)" to raw-initrd since current implementation shouldn't ever end up in initrd, but this would be helpful if we actually implement booting from LVM and I think I saw request to add it there in open-raid-device. I also tend not to answer to things I agree with and was a bit busy with work recently, so I hope you understand me taking so long to answer. Thanks, Mikhail