From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id cH+JCcU2wmUsDQEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:40:21 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id cH+JCcU2wmUsDQEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:40:21 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1707226821; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=iIHBMJw4oYnrHFI0/akgvaDISoOLk89PcND6tcM8UiM=; b=gaTCfbGp1WTnC+xeK3vCVQp8evO/vV6p1JZimBLmlr3ArcVtcCMItEGBMNizw1Ua+wor/6 0jSL73azqQ9+xeMB5LAB1od1cQH0/bI8zxxRWd+VchvHbyTdQNeVEeqqu16/8OkgDEY+gB qlmnxiWvQMwyRxq0hwuHexgPKTeAcOpjtUhkH/sAIl2GJVfoBtzZx766nWutZwHAJkUAm8 98/vhj2FmIC+n71fxlCiNoOIOn7z2NrI7Yg0vb5xC2/ZzWJFgHrgG5dwfSvjSbKmnLCShW 0/lBCocBTe9IJMviNTSvMRq2mjbbyl7Sadw/Jxxqn4T/mHlFNesey3Tj2IMe5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1707226821; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=uK2A52BO1d4mg6kaipv2SwEp14U5ql+ZuAwCuMTRyjOCMBXRrBxSi1HQtnW6x0at0/7WTX 57FMYaTR6Wd731cYoL91IBqoQwjo5/4HlMywRMEM8wij9rjb24i5sSlY3W/rKr304YHB/T cyznONhgRcYdFFU0qoU3LFuQHFOWzEmu+/P8wZSELYfyC17p7cf2oFZwQDUkWf1CfeeUsM TrDUK2svObgAESoveULlR/G0cWm5ICKg4GjGn87z0s+qO2nf1EIeESrKYgJ6QF2mrJ7M7g 0U7QCo+kW0N8cNMQcmz+ZXD0kzJj9qkmxPvJ68fmDUFOcTXulKSD571hyy+C6A== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 108EE12034 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 14:40:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXLfj-0003WA-9f; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:39:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXLfh-0003VU-KM for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:39:33 -0500 Received: from mailtransmit04.runbox.com ([2a0c:5a00:149::25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXLfg-0001n3-8a for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 08:39:33 -0500 Received: from mailtransmit02.runbox ([10.9.9.162] helo=aibo.runbox.com) by mailtransmit04.runbox.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1rXLfb-00E2dZ-5r for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:39:27 +0100 Received: from [10.9.9.72] (helo=submission01.runbox) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rXLfa-00042y-Ak; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:39:26 +0100 Received: by submission01.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated ID (641962)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) id 1rXLfZ-001OCy-Bo; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:39:25 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:39:21 +0000 From: Steve George To: Edouard Klein Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion Message-ID: References: <10c82db7-6fc6-4fa0-8213-e207fa54db58@futurile.net> <87il3167se.fsf@rdklein.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87il3167se.fsf@rdklein.fr> Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=2a0c:5a00:149::25; envelope-from=steve@futurile.net; helo=mailtransmit04.runbox.com X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.95 X-Spam-Score: -3.95 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 108EE12034 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: QaAvVLlKYEFx Hi Edouard, On 6 Feb, Edouard Klein wrote: > I, for one, would be willing to review patches, hoping that in turn my > patches would be reviewed instead of staying in limbo forever, which is > a drag on me submitting more patches. > > Is there a procedure to follow, or do I just start replying "LGTM" to > patch email threads ? Starting to review patches would be brilliant. I agreed to organise some 'patch review' online sessions in the next couple of weeks. Organising a basic process is a good topic for that online session. For example, elsewhere in the thread someone mentions some tags we could use consistently so maintainers can find patches that have been reviewed easily. It would be great to agree those - try them for a bit - and document them in a 'howto' so that everyone uses the same process. Steve