From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: P Subject: Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation? Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:20:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87a7h8u4r4.fsf@gnu.org> <20190402150245.GA30067@darkstar> <256d60e8-0148-1dd3-4c9d-86e14b42060b@bothner.com> <20190407162804.GA28500@darkstar.example.net> <87k1g4v8dq.fsf@gnu.org> <20190413162121.GA28137@darkstar.example.net> Reply-To: P Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-texinfo-bounces+gnu-bug-texinfo2=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-texinfo" To: Gavin Smith Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= , "guix-devel@gnu.org" , Per Bothner , Texinfo List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 7:27 PM, Gavin Smith wrote: > WebKitGTK seemed to be the best option for a lightweight embedded > web-browser. I looked into other options, such as the Gecko engine > used inside Thunderbird, but apparently it is not supported any more > to embed it in other programs. WebKitGTK allowed access to the DOM > tree of the documents without the complication of communicating with > embedded JavaScript, as was needed with QtWebEngine. > Out of curiosity, have you looked at smaller browser engines, such as Dillo= or Netsurf?