From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id PxX9HcyNDF/3YQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:37:32 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id UOFfGcyNDF/RVgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:37:32 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED1309401CF for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54254 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jv1SM-0002km-V2 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:37:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jv1SF-0002kb-Aw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:37:23 -0400 Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.134]:12830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jv1SD-00052M-6r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:37:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:37:09 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elenq.tech; s=protonmail; t=1594658236; bh=mPMJ25sWanXZEEg5+ZaddDvgcUmwi4hV4urLUh7e7E0=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GigkDe7IfvmiA7xMdHvIWVz/sC63fnDZ69c+hDfGbYGhdV4vf70HAnqe5zQKnsNnX YNTOc5UZB3EMGcmETpQLGU7VoztWd4qxH7WQKO30q6h74hQqeO/OzhP1iVTliJEC2e rG6xpLHOt0/C7Vv0LEwgvdkOBqmahZ2HEippdIAA= To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= From: Ekaitz Zarraga Subject: Re: gcc-10 toolchain does not include string to numeric conversion functions like std::stoull Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87d04zo5qq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eeqndk54.fsf@gnu.org> <87d04zo5qq.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.134; envelope-from=ekaitz@elenq.tech; helo=mail-40134.protonmail.ch X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/13 12:37:17 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -37 X-Spam_score: -3.8 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Ekaitz Zarraga Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=elenq.tech header.s=protonmail header.b=GigkDe7I; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=elenq.tech (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.59 X-TUID: Bj2m03tqth6D Hi, On Monday, July 13, 2020 4:21 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote= : > Unfortunately I haven=E2=80=99t dug further. Help welcome! > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. I'd like to help but I don't know where to start (yet). I've found the same issue in older gcc-toolchains. 9.3.0 and 8.4.0 also fai= l. Many functions are affected, strtol, stoi... all have the same issue. Looks _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDLIB is not set as you said so it fails to make an= y of these conversions from std::string. Do you know any gcc version where this works? Thanks