From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ineiev via RT" Subject: [gnu.org #881181] Package synopses and blurbs translation Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 06:50:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <201401112334.s0BNY1eu029773@freefriends.org> <87bnya3qjo.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: web-translators@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEdlZ-000710-NA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 06:50:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEdlU-0007j3-VO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 06:50:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-womb@gnu.org > [ludo@gnu.org - Fri Feb 14 06:03:29 2014]: > > "Ineiev via RT" skribis: > > > > So, are we to change the source format of blurb items to HTML? if yes, > > I'd file > > a patch to bug-womb. > > I became convinced that we (Guix) could just get files from the Web > translators and patch occurrences of . Really a hack, but it’s > probably less intrusive for the rest of us. Then there is no point in changing anything in womb (at least, not now).