From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Ineiev via RT" <web-translators@gnu.org>
Subject: [gnu.org #881181] Package synopses and blurbs translation
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 06:50:21 -0500
Message-ID: <rt-3.4.5-1151-1392465020-1982.881181-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-881181@rt.gnu.org>
	<201401112334.s0BNY1eu029773@freefriends.org>
	<rt-3.4.5-15502-1389483278-760.881181-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
	<rt-3.4.5-19632-1392359091-556.881181-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
	<87bnya3qjo.fsf@gnu.org>
	<rt-3.4.5-8064-1392375809-1042.881181-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
Reply-To: web-translators@gnu.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43843)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <www-data@gnu.org>) id 1WEdlZ-000710-NA
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 06:50:46 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <www-data@gnu.org>) id 1WEdlU-0007j3-VO
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 06:50:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <rt-3.4.5-8064-1392375809-1042.881181-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: ludo@gnu.org
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-womb@gnu.org

> [ludo@gnu.org - Fri Feb 14 06:03:29 2014]:
> 
> "Ineiev via RT" <web-translators@gnu.org> skribis:
> >
> > So, are we to change the source format of blurb items to HTML? if yes,
> > I'd file
> > a patch to bug-womb.
> 
> I became convinced that we (Guix) could just get files from the Web
> translators and patch occurrences of <code>.  Really a hack, but it’s
> probably less intrusive for the rest of us.

Then there is no point in changing anything in womb (at least, not now).