From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Alexandrov <321942@gmail.com> Subject: Re: moderation, please Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 00:04:13 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20191012180038.gb5xpee3r4p2lg5h@uptimegirl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <321942@gmail.com>) id 1iJOe7-0004K7-Lj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 17:09:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <321942@gmail.com>) id 1iJOYl-0001og-Ue for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 17:04:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20191012180038.gb5xpee3r4p2lg5h@uptimegirl> (ng0@n0.is's message of "Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:00:38 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0 wrote: > this list is to discuss the _development_ of GNU Guix, Shepherd, and Guix= System. > > It is not a general discussion list for everything else. > > While we usually get by fine without imposing moderation restrictions, I = don't see how any of the recent message floods have been ontopic to this li= st Yes, indeed, though I cannot imagine, how an offtopic limited to few thread= s can hurt any person minimally capable of using a MUA. > (other than the original announcement of the blog post Indeed? > If it isn't already on moderation for some people, it would be very kind = to do so as numerous active people asked for this (and the people in questi= on are on record not willing to stop the messages). Anyway, =E2=80=98to stop=E2=80=99 is the most unconstructive proposal, it n= ever works. If you can name a better mailing list, please do so. E. g., @= ams@gnu.org believes for some reason, than otherwise pretty dead gnu-system= -discuss@gnu.org is not suitable for discussion of the future of GNU system= in the light of recent events either. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE1yoTx9fONarixgNIydoJ3hnBsjAFAl2iP80ACgkQydoJ3hnB sjCfpAgArmRVxa4ETzJcK5JU4FHkLZCMtfCZyXR+6UhNegOgU3kaD1IuiQTkiXRo KCP/JhUWsUMZy/6GiFM6CnWZBhZQUPbdUICMlGDB1XXxCH7f7hxgPSIKxvXwqSPx 8Nz9XbkhSeZBFXOSTqe0ee/FtHkeJa0tKQ8h8kkts9lBLktk5e3zRTR7qO7TRizO O74xPLezxVg/MKOfJvj80HmIDXxIq97U48voWCfZvq8P3o+4Iz2pMKqzH7hDUEji /NymIsIDmMHToFmIboJbVmc10pySNutokDp4/moLSdPIpELTBYGz5YpvDzYpYJdj n0fSnt31sJsJpzr/MBTXsCDgTGz+gQ== =ZiiF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--