From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KJ8ZKTaH8F4oYwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:25:58 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id +LXwJDaH8F4qXwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:25:58 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 490EB940A21 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36230 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnJeH-0000HS-1Y for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:25:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnJdz-0000HJ-Ea for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:25:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:47682 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnJdw-0002ZP-Gq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:25:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1592821535; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RmpyHVGCtB1/X2NYFW4mrglb6iXOZyy0jEQm//AnJ90=; b=UJ04HKIoZiK1XIx5+NUaP+iJCbMkhA25pibzVGhNsiEbPf97TeaaXU5MGeHs+bM2HW0C9r czDJvvQw6b+icutmF3K9aPZTl0s6os39MXh0dNkh4nSj4EoX+nzHggDLm+MEv8ketQ1I11 0Uo6KWfz9vP8+yOnTsvaQ6tUHAy6OV4= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-384-ubhdLA5uM0O2LZxhqOhJJA-1; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:25:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ubhdLA5uM0O2LZxhqOhJJA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a4so10634918wrp.5 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:25:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O5zWAh7+mWARg2sIEdBB9ODpkqL+JtfKcKSufiAWr9c=; b=EE/EU2W6lWBTVsxbILM/59+7d6NWfzig5YUU+45cExfPsbBTLb2YYtLD056oYq93Jq bs3f4nDBLX5QKmNJyq5C/lk7q5UFZQ1nIxa7RFD2bI+o376sFEmTUXtxPXbqXwhtugiG BpoAFh4H8QGIYgtjhotrA5NUD3SEoJenIdLd8JLHx48Exyp3CWJAAd5Mq1xbp4nE8Mtw SC7owxaK4pJ3PmNkmV+9IzTGPYOM6CRuitdqRGeWZuHlMG/7cOvfTJNXtS/4wdMU4C3S m9Gn0W1IoY/gPycQymJH/pp3jhDFqKi6gJnucgByOxYjEsY2yt7X2DcY+nzQxUFTnufi D0+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bt1K9JDIIh4kaQ/Rre+OOLrldhol3nbuBJjaiWKwyexD4T2O2 E65xVAm7/W0OPPYMzWsj06f3zGNetsV1zLf1KczrBL3+UW23HRyo5Vg/d+Jbb7y2eszs7XnmwZe rmT0riNQC3uE= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f70e:: with SMTP id r14mr19443300wrp.150.1592821531681; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:25:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOB8VkadhLqF9Af2xy5Liw7T4p4PVMUj4HheOudKfruIdJ8JyhRjQz4y6qzepsQ6TEMd9AJA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f70e:: with SMTP id r14mr19443280wrp.150.1592821531380; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:25:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jsynacek-ntb.brq.redhat.com (ip-185-149-130-112.kmenet.cz. [185.149.130.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 185sm16543658wmz.22.2020.06.22.03.25.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:25:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Jan Synacek To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: backtrace when building os In-Reply-To: <87pn9uda3g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pn9uda3g.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:25:27 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.120; envelope-from=jsynacek@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/22 01:27:42 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UJ04HKIo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: aucln4d+kcqS Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Jan Synacek skribis: > >> $ cat guix-os.scm >> (use-modules (gnu bootloader) >> =09 (gnu bootloader grub) >> =09 (gnu system file-systems)) >> >> (operating-system >> (host-name "jsynacek-guix-os") >> (timezone "Europe/Prague") >> (locale "en_US.utf8") >> (bootloader >> (bootloader-configuration >> (bootloader grub-efi-bootloader) >> (target "/dev/sdx"))) >> (file-systems >> (list (file-system (mount-point "/home") >> (device "/dev/sda33") >> (type "ext4"))))) > > This OS lacks a root file system (which is no excuse for throwing a > backtrace, though!). Thank you for the explanation. And I agree about the backtrace part. I have already filed a bug report, although I accidentaly filed it against guile, instead of guix. Sorry for the mess. Regards, --=20 Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat