From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add CUPS. Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:38:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8AgG-0006tE-9r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:39:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8AgB-0005mp-8K for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:39:00 -0500 Received: from venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.30]:42144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8AgB-0005l1-0J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:38:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thompson, David" Cc: guix-devel Thompson, David writes: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Ricardo Wurmus > wrote: >> >> I'm also not sure if creating two outputs "out" and "include" is >> correct. To build OpenJDK with IcedTea I need to have both the library >> output and the include files and after splitting the outputs this worked >> fine. > > That doesn't seem correct. I don't see a reason to have a second > output here. With a single output "out", everything will be included. I'm sure you are right; this is probably a case of cargo-cult programming... The recipe for OpenJDK/IcedTea is still pretty messy at this point and I suppose this confused me. I'll try again with a single output.