From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add FASTX Toolkit. Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:31:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lhhtximr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YifD1-0002cn-8G for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:31:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YifCw-0008Ui-68 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:31:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lhhtximr.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> "fastx-toolkit" installs three m4 files to "$out/share/aclocal", and >> libgtextutils installs an empty "$out/share/aclocal" directoy. I >> reported this upstream, but I did not add a phase to remove these file= s, >> because I think it's not a big deal. Is this okay or should I modify >> the sources to avoid installing these files? > > What=E2=80=99s wrong with these files? It looks fine to me, and it=E2=80= =99s the > standard directory for Autoconf macros. So no problem IMO. :-) They are not necessary to use fastx-toolkit, so I'd rather avoid the clutter. The author seems to agree and is willing to accept patches to fix this. >> + (home-page "http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit") > > Maybe the github.com URL? Okay. I pushed the two commits with the suggested changes. Thanks for the review! ~~ Ricardo