From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Biopython. Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:46:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87618xyxmq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YifRH-0005B0-RS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:46:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YifRD-0005KV-Nn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 04:46:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87618xyxmq.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> From ca3474b1a639e43d708aad4385057cd84e3cce8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Ricardo Wurmus >> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:46:35 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add Biopython. >> >> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (python-biopython, python2-biopython= ): New >> variables. > > [...] > >> + (home-page "http://biopython.org/") >> + (synopsis "Set of tools for biological computation in Python") > > s/Set of// Okay. >> + (description >> + "Biopython is a set of tools for biological computation written = in Python >> +by an international team of developers.") > > What about removing =E2=80=9Cwritten ...=E2=80=9D and instead giving a = few keywords of > the features/algorithms it implements? I've changed the description to this: "Biopython is a set of tools for biological computation including pa= rsers for bioinformatics files into Python data structures; interfaces to commo= n bioinformatics programs; a standard sequence class and tools for performi= ng common operations on them; code to perform data classification; code for dealing with alignments; code making it easy to split up parallelizable t= asks into separate processes; and more." After checking the license again, I have doubts whether it really is Expat. The wording of the license differs from that of the Expat license, though the meaning is very similar. http://www.biopython.org/DIST/LICENSE http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Expat FWIW, Fedora names the license "MIT" in their python-biopython package. Is it really okay for me to use "license:expat" or should I use a different one? ~~ Ricardo