From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: screenshot of the web interface to the GNU Guix package manager Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:22:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2v3l85r7oy0f49wn919rcuup8@onionmail.info> <87a8ftm48k.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49055) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bf6Ps-0003DM-RU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:23:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bf6Pn-0007Od-NM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:23:00 -0400 Received: from venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.30]:37613) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bf6Pn-0007OO-Cp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:22:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a8ftm48k.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, knxrby@onionmail.info ng0 writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> knxrby@onionmail.info writes: >> >>> On https://git.dthompson.us/guix-web.git/blob/HEAD:/README.md >>> >>> there is a dead link to >>> http://media.dthompson.us/mgoblin_media/media_entries/20/Screenshot_f= rom_2014-08-13_180724.png >>> >>> - so no visible screenshot of the web interface to the GNU Guix packa= ge >>> manager here... >>> >>> >>> Does anyone have a screenshot maybe? Thx! >> >> You can see a running instance of Guix web at >> . >> >> It runs a slightly modified version of Dave=E2=80=99s code. >> >> ~~ Ricardo >> > > A good number of people have pointed out to me that our /packages page > crashes their browser or in general is really uncomfortable to load. > The impression would be better if we provided something which might not > be 100% done but at least does not crash/hang systems. > What's in the way to use guix-web instead of the listing we have? > Perfectionism and/or a lack of time? I seem to remember that it would have to be hosted elsewhere because all GNU pages are static and managed in CVS. ~~ Ricardo