From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 11 little Ruby gems.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:35:05 +0200
Message-ID: <idjegh82hgm.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
References: <idjwpvq7mnv.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<CAJ=RwfYd=xOCa8BXYLT6sqSzuu9H-Wt4aHwEt1NrD709GTVzEw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40330)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1ZjTKp-0005Jo-Tv
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:35:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1ZjTKk-0008GC-Mu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:35:19 -0400
Received: from sinope.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.23]:40375)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1ZjTKk-0008D7-Dl
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:35:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAJ=RwfYd=xOCa8BXYLT6sqSzuu9H-Wt4aHwEt1NrD709GTVzEw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


Thompson, David <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:

> Hey Ricardo,
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Ricardo Wurmus
> <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> attached are a couple of patches that resulted from a recent attempt t=
o
>> traverse the dependency graph for a dependency of some tool I wanted t=
o
>> package.
>>
>> I=E2=80=99m not happy with =E2=80=980007-gnu-Add-ruby-rb-fsevent.patch=
=E2=80=99 because it is to
>> be used on a Mac OSX, but unfortunately this is a required input for
>> a more general file system library that is in my pipeline.
>>
>> I=E2=80=99m also not happy with disabling tests for =E2=80=98ruby-yard=
=E2=80=99, but I didn=E2=80=99t
>> find a way to make them pass.
>
> I pushed the first 6 patches with only a couple of minor
> comment/description tweaks.  Still need to look into what can be done
> about patch 7 and the test suite for yard.

According to [1] the Yard tests can only be run with RSpec version 2.12.
Do you know of any compatibility layer that would allow us to run the
tests with our more recent version of RSpec?  I=E2=80=99m not keen on pac=
kaging
a different version of RSpec (+ dependencies), to be honest.

~~ Ricardo

[1]: https://github.com/lsegal/yard/issues/687#issuecomment-21759075