From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add preseq. Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:33:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r3osronp.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAI8k-0008CC-P2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 09:33:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAI8f-0007Fn-7y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 09:33:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r3osronp.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> + (snippet >> + ;; Remove bundled samtools. Leave the headers. >> + '(for-each delete-file >> + (find-files "preseq-master/samtools" >> + "\\.c$"))))) > > Why leave the headers? Isn=E2=80=99t it risky to leave headers that ma= y be > different from the Samtools that we=E2=80=99re actually linking against= ? The problem is with our Samtools package(s). They don't install headers. I'd better update them to install the headers; then I could just delete the complete "samtools" directory.