From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Guile 2.2 packages Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 19:02:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87twdrlkjn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhgFG-00021n-A4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 13:02:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhgFB-0008Fu-Mg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 13:02:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87twdrlkjn.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hello! > > The Guile 2.2 series is becoming a reality, so time has come to provide > packages built with/for Guile 2.2 (aka. 2.1, aka. =E2=80=98guile-next=E2= =80=99). [...] > > The main difficulty is that upstream build systems and some of our > recipes hard-code =E2=80=9C/2.0=E2=80=9D in the name of the module inst= allation > directories. I=E2=80=99ve fixed that in a few packages in the commits = preceding > the one above. I=E2=80=99m afraid there=E2=80=99s no simple automated = way to fix that, > other than telling upstream developers to do the right thing. This is very timely! In a project that I=E2=80=99m working on I=E2=80=99= ve just defined guile-next versions of guile-json and guile-redis, both of which hardcode =E2=80=9C2.0=E2=80=9D in a snippet. Thanks! ~~ Ricardo