unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz>
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" <guix-devel@gnu.org>,
	Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Build timers
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 04:03:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fBaqTTKqq9VHjnszAyJdxF5WVBKclPR4n9qH-8U4tEeq1AF8dgLCEL9m38ALOPvXk4b5ttYbqamC3hOVAUrEcMnh3k0jwcy4ihZeJIhvXsc=@rixotstudio.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875ysh5mmr.fsf@ponder>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2419 bytes --]

Make it clear it's an estimate, or maybe even abstract away the time units so that there is no expectation of any particular time. -- Vagrant

My theory is designed with tolerance of <5 min with max tolerance of =10 min with methods that I am confident will get us within <30 sec assuming sufficient amount of data to construct the variables.

-- Jacob "Kreyren" Hrbek

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Wednesday, November 24th, 2021 at 8:23 PM, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> wrote:

> On 2021-11-24, zimoun wrote:
> 

> > On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 18:50, Julien Lepiller julien@lepiller.eu wrote:
> > 

> > > Do we even care that much about accuracy? I don't really care that the
> > > 

> > > build takes 30 or 31 seconds, or even 1 minute, but I certainly care
> > > 

> > > whether it takes 30s or 3h. I think this is also what SBUs give you: a
> > > 

> > > rough estimate of which build is longer than the other. I think a
> > > 

> > > simple proportionality relation would work well enough in most common
> > > 

> > > cases. It might be quite off on a super computer, but who cares,
> > > 

> > > really?
> > 

> > What if it takes 3h and the prediction says 2h?
> 

> Those sound about "the same" for any kind of reasonable expectation...
> 

> I would guess you only want the correct order of magnitude... hours,
> 

> minutes, days, weeks, months, years... or maybe quick, fast, slow,
> 

> painful.
> 

> I do this soft of fuzzy estimation all the time when working on
> 

> Reproducible Builds in Debian; look at the past test history to get a
> 

> rough estimate of how long I might expect a build to take. This helps
> 

> me decide if I should start a build and get a $COFFEE, do some
> 

> $SWORDFIGHTING on the $OFFICECHAIRS, or sit and watch the progress bar
> 

> so I don't loose the mental state working on the problem becuase it will
> 

> be done $SOON.
> 

> Make it clear it's an estimate, or maybe even abstract away the time
> 

> units so that there is no expectation of any particular time.
> 

> I know there are people who would love to get a a value that was
> 

> consistently right but to be useful it only needs an estimate to be
> 

> mostly not completely wrong. At least to me. :)
> 

> live well,
> 

> vagrant

[-- Attachment #1.2: publickey - kreyren@rixotstudio.cz - 0x1677DB82.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 737 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-25  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-22 22:02 Proposal: Build timers Jacob Hrbek
2021-11-23  1:06 ` zimoun
2021-11-23  6:21   ` Jacob Hrbek
2021-11-23 11:56     ` zimoun
2021-11-23 14:39       ` Jacob Hrbek
2021-11-24 11:35         ` zimoun
2021-11-25  4:00           ` Jacob Hrbek
2021-11-23 12:05     ` Julien Lepiller
2021-11-23 16:23       ` zimoun
2021-11-23 20:09 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2021-11-23 21:31   ` Jacob Hrbek
2021-11-23 21:35   ` Jacob Hrbek
2021-11-23 23:50     ` Julien Lepiller
2021-11-24 11:31       ` zimoun
2021-11-24 20:23         ` Vagrant Cascadian
2021-11-24 21:50           ` zimoun
2021-11-25  4:03           ` Jacob Hrbek [this message]
2021-11-25  5:21             ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2021-11-25 10:23             ` zimoun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='fBaqTTKqq9VHjnszAyJdxF5WVBKclPR4n9qH-8U4tEeq1AF8dgLCEL9m38ALOPvXk4b5ttYbqamC3hOVAUrEcMnh3k0jwcy4ihZeJIhvXsc=@rixotstudio.cz' \
    --to=kreyren@rixotstudio.cz \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=liliana.prikler@gmail.com \
    --cc=vagrant@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).