From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Isaac Subject: Re: font-build-system Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 22:05:04 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20170205125841.hsywh3xuyoabt4vq@wasp> <20170511201500.xopertmlrwg4pvue@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32923) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAIyK-0005RP-7W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 12:35:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAIyH-0004jT-3W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 12:35:48 -0400 Received: from o111.p8.mailjet.com ([87.253.233.111]:48051) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAIyG-0004j3-Pi for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 12:35:45 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org >> But this won't solve the fc-cache problem as the reply by Mark >> suggests. >> >> A build system would be good though. > > I didn't mean to solve the fc-cache problem. I was only talking about > the unpack and install phases which was the original subject of this > thread. We can add the fc-cache part of the solution later, once we have > figured it out. I have WIP patches for a font-build-system here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D26941 =