Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field

[Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>]

Am Sonntag, dem 02.01.2022 um 17:57 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
> Hi Liliana,
> 
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Am Samstag, dem 01.01.2022 um 15:37 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
> > > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> > > > > Where is the Cantor-style diagonalization argument that you
> > > > > spoke of?
> > > > You skipped over it, read again.  The key point is that you're
> > > > referencing the thing you think will be invalidated to create
> > > > your scheme.
> > > I've carefully read your message at least 4 times, but I've been
> > > unable to find anything resembling Cantor's diagonalization
> > > argument in there.  Does anyone else see it?  Perhaps my powers
> > > of recognition are too weak.
> > Can I help your powers of recognition by describing everything in
> > terms of Turing machines?
> 
> How about pointing out what acts as the diagonal in your reasoning?
If you are talking specifically about the uncountability of real
numbers, that'd be quite deep down (as in an uncountability of push
actions to a particular Git repo, particularly if we also allow
reinitialization).  My overview was admittedly too high-level; I jumped
ahead to the "this sentence is a lie" statement, which is "I trust,
that this tag which I don't trust, resolves to a particular commit". 
Mea culpa.