unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: rain1@openmailbox.org
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: About collision encountered arbitrarily choosing ...
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:58:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee55d4982e86aa7cd1b62562dedebee6@openmailbox.org> (raw)

I was just thinking about the warnings you get after installing 
packages:

warning: collision encountered
warning: arbitrarily choosing

because there are a lot of them and they generally don't matter or cause 
problems I have learned to ignore them.. but I just spotted this 
collision today:

/gnu/store/...-lsh-2.1/share/man/man8/sftp-server.8.gz
/gnu/store/...-openssh-7.2p2/share/man/man8/sftp-server.8.gz

That's only a man page substitution but really any package can shadow 
any file with 50% chance (can probably make it 100% by setting up the 
hash to come lexically first, not sure).

A bad package could sneakily replace a core system library with, for 
example, insecure crypto code. So I think it is something that should be 
dealt with.

-------------------------------------------

I had a look at past discussions on this:

* https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-05/msg00437.html
* https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-12/msg00106.html
* https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-09/msg00213.html
* https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-07/msg00668.html

one idea was a whitelist to reduce the amount of errors displayed.

I've made a list of the collisions I see on my system:

* [gnome] /share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache
* [gnome] /lib/gio/modules/giomodule.cache
* [gnome] /share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled
* [gnome] /bin/gtk-update-icon-cache # because there are 2 versions of 
gtk
* [python] /bin/coverage
* [python] /bin/.coverage3-wrap-01
* [python] /bin/py.test-3.4
* [python] /bin/.py.test-wrap-01
* [python] /bin/.py.test-3.4-wrap-01

A suggestion I have for helping reduce this is there could be a post 
install phase in gtk build system to delete those specific .cache files. 
There could also be a similar one in those python libraries.

Do people agree that this is a potential problem? If so I could attempt 
to add such an phase. Or maybe there are other solutions that would 
solve this better?

             reply	other threads:[~2016-03-27 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-27 18:58 rain1 [this message]
2016-03-27 21:30 ` About collision encountered arbitrarily choosing Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee55d4982e86aa7cd1b62562dedebee6@openmailbox.org \
    --to=rain1@openmailbox.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).