From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Pimentel Subject: Re: texlive failure Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:50:05 -0300 Message-ID: References: <20150210133430.GA21871@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLBCj-00072v-MA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:50:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLBCi-0006HX-PD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:50:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150210133430.GA21871@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: Guix-devel , guix-devel-bounces+d4n1=opmbx.org@gnu.org, Federico Beffa On 2015-02-10 10:34, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:56:17PM +0100, Federico Beffa wrote: >> So, I guess grafting takes a very long time. For this package it is >> not substantially faster than building the package itself. :-( > > The speciality of texlive is that it is relatively easy to build - some > CPU time > for the binaries. Then the data is essentially only unpacked and some > of the > binaries are run on them, but the latter takes only minutes. So I would > always > recommend to (re-)build the package locally. > > Andreas I can install texlive after "guix pull", it work. Thanks, -- Daniel Pimentel (d4n1)