From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GIczBVk/zF77KQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 21:57:45 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 2Dv/AFk/zF4EFwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 21:57:45 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB05194042C for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 21:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36846 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdL6N-00017W-QY for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 17:57:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdL6F-00017P-SS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 17:57:35 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::431]:35700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdL6E-00050b-ER for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 17:57:35 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id x14so13057609wrp.2 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 14:57:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dvd98L6kOoy0rxNCTZLPcqKcTUZ3xZpFV3z9uoKZx/o=; b=croOgpJ4BzZ50H528GGXErRPScabgG5FIagwyxejARBUBtn6EDt+ojxhO/mZkRv9rI BxfYAKQYcCZYNNzhsc12tb16xHWQAnBR9N6hHk2VK5kJ1oNnQTX1xh04HKFW3/F1rq7j siiK5jPIfE6A25INtaFkzUj/+auvh3+i7nizcG1yL1e92S0HFypkRoVToxHchDDDpdPm ahJnvYZ0CHufIsK54l6N70+TqiXwIklMol97zfr+5T1rLtQ7wjuqkxvEkNT1jox30kMw 1nK8s8obBSOAfSADB3XCkS0KRSjhOK+tWj7qep8ELKTmLXWPf4xkyHBWnegdPvNgwKhp ks+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dvd98L6kOoy0rxNCTZLPcqKcTUZ3xZpFV3z9uoKZx/o=; b=eBp81AeuM9vb8ZIABATPLGls1w5Osj2way0PpdCjlmmCDI+LntMHEE2ODhi3EKQ0M2 KODUb6sdnmd2Vj5H1MR9lxkLvTNWUVhxDqyyElF/ryOoxmTRscq/4SDoPW8zvAPV9K8G eYcYBObywqtxcxLD/9DdudrzmiAwDYVEJBG1FWXVFlaaiPK8Ch1JA/Te2wuWZdBL6G2o 6bEk/WIOMdLFAj4suBuZiDGh1E/zBujynZGo+5BQr7ttu75eQkBGK4yzHn/qvLlA4nid fEBvWvWR/KyCW9sJRifbSqzmEZD0Zo+Al9a2hwHQvkCCfkq72foWTO2aOopDir06oFx6 ovHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532iXm4ezkK04ADVMsgZkFZCXr8qsAcCxV42Bki9d/VVEHY159gz B87eTRBYWlv9y6wF9L5SLHsQImPo X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9nSZlsktDBWv/V4g42K8Z7AeoMFETCusafTaBBcDJZGs9sTJdI0mkKiulXU/TvCZrAa95ZA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e450:: with SMTP id t16mr18177589wrm.66.1590443852691; Mon, 25 May 2020 14:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (se167-1-82-242-148-1.fbx.proxad.net. [82.242.148.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g82sm2995326wmf.1.2020.05.25.14.57.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 May 2020 14:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Should guix track package aliases? To: Josh Marshall , =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=c3=b2_Balzarotti?= References: <87blmcmd9b.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> From: Vincent Legoll Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 23:57:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::431; envelope-from=vincent.legoll@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x431.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=croOgpJ4; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.71 X-TUID: 4h03O6zRWewx Hello, On 25/05/2020 16:20, Josh Marshall wrote: > Checking out repology.org/repository/gnuguix > , it got picked up and guix > looks like it is in much better shape. Yay, but we're still far from the front page's top repositories... But, to celebrate our come back into the fray, I've grabbed a few low hanging fruits from the outdated and/or potentially vulnerable list. Series incoming (on guix-patches, issue #41533)... -- Vincent Legoll