From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Becze Subject: Re: Overhauling the cargo-build-system Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 18:35:46 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20191010155056.GD1301@E5400> <87d0f4p6xd.fsf@gnu.org> <20191011141342.GC13364@E5400> <87imnjtsk3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWAQN-0008Tx-Rj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 21:36:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWAQM-0005nJ-JO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 21:36:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87imnjtsk3.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org > What I would have liked is to somehow replace the #:cargo-inputs > argument (which is build-system-specific and thus =E2=80=9Copaque=E2=80= =9D) with regular > =E2=80=98native-inputs=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98inputs=E2=80=99 field. That would be lovely! I always wondered why "#:cargo-inputs" existed.