From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id AD6VHdvzBmU8hQAAG6o9tA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:40:59 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id AD6VHdvzBmU8hQAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:40:59 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B5D4B228 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:40:58 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=msavoritias.me header.s=20210930 header.b=NrPVZdr+; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=msavoritias.me (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1694954459; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=0trYH3iQISiyA/ReFtYZxuIzuqOSWqnSK+MK0sAAYPA=; b=N9OwtZ4SxJMPq8sE394p1SRueaefBWEblXM+rdgVLvsBMc+myUkurctCjIo5qfIcc5Nsts OYTcIiKstws8eGQ1e+/ltAZ+OdW3TL6hR5i4C6n5Q9s+NCXga8jNvxu+J2n1Zrj+86n6V/ fiXPXN2AGsiM5GuwEd5cgytTzZqVyyMsNsgVvzbBx9M9gkc/5hPNBiGyM118eoGA541/+L krR79YEjNe7akGmUlNqEs4a+IesQwGkQfHWUvW5rKGO/NS9u9ZjZIrjBjItvukxaw4GYuF AiIMLUfYjqeBgiIJC53sKrKFSeJvZ4DZcHqKnQDf0NQaL16YzLFqARsXFt7fHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=msavoritias.me header.s=20210930 header.b=NrPVZdr+; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=msavoritias.me (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1694954459; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=A9FMOtCS9ppmU8L4KYuamml2N96bbhCTVb8/nD4OghE998M1i2p9R1sM+O85NQnMioyIYd pt+moHAnbHZXplta4gIN/qxxQDsTQ3QGWFYkbuIWyqFUsDY6sjb017UIDvpXwum8Bxx6ll IemT8LnRDm3eqRRmkDYCb4Zq6dLUJZNpcZPyHYw/EuWDoCm8xi1cQlRHkm/MC6EDFaGjhT YzjU6O0634vZdOnhcbFHxdZID7IFCs6bLQpNCf/gj5n2wV6dfdXKuImnxEw5z+ufwMYDs1 8ywttYOfVuPtOick+yE4YEzOYBucdgYlJM1bayfwKJ9wHKURJSQbZWXvI7j7ag== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qhr4M-000173-DV; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 08:40:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qhr4K-00016r-BF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 08:40:08 -0400 Received: from mail.webarch.email ([81.95.52.48]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qhr4I-0001h0-80 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 08:40:08 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id BF7D11A8D601; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 13:39:54 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=msavoritias.me; s=20210930; t=1694954401; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=0trYH3iQISiyA/ReFtYZxuIzuqOSWqnSK+MK0sAAYPA=; b=NrPVZdr+G4ht7UMc+7wRL6Urxp6TkdPOKLy3+CKCW/ZhqWvboECiXOn8DHht4/OkgYIbTI 36m9k/BOYHzg1kzjrHr5aBh3N897UZsbSrETIarZ60fX7SD/qQxHsQ47eQCFAICnE/jN7q qamhQD0fwoIhfhw90z4vi9ilp27bMwmSSGVvf//dclxsRvvJdUzYs8Qzgk+Pc1j2Kpt9+r 6U+FhiNR1FsL7czDGYNG3TVh5X1Rmllu+PhCp2Mq7dtUJSx8ED/YS4IOxyW/C/9aARAgl0 JeIZQtQ5H1jytMIBwnaiFDnHbpBYbsdrOiUExwvsfdtthq2rssWqxXM9v1DAlg== Message-ID: Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 15:39:51 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Subject: Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors? Content-Language: en-US To: Maxim Cournoyer , Csepp Cc: Giovanni Biscuolo , Liliana Marie Prikler , guix-devel@gnu.org References: <20230827135726.y33t55w4cvq6zsvb@X-kone> <874jkift8v.fsf@gmail.com> <867cp4sj7k.fsf@gmail.com> <38242808-2f06-4674-3842-aea1a5378d05@gmail.com> <86v8cop6sy.fsf@gmail.com> <8634zrpt40.fsf@gmail.com> <37edb289-d49e-0d74-05f2-4cc93c6129aa@gmail.com> <87cyyodgy5.fsf@xelera.eu> <87v8cfbvwr.fsf@xelera.eu> <87wmwvwik8.fsf@gmail.com> From: MSavoritias In-Reply-To: <87wmwvwik8.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.95.52.48; envelope-from=email@msavoritias.me; helo=mail.webarch.email X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.473, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 1.19 X-Spam-Score: 1.19 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F3B5D4B228 X-TUID: c3VubamVV2vo On 9/12/23 17:51, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi, > > Csepp writes: > >> Giovanni Biscuolo writes: >> >>> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] >>> Hello Csepp, >>> >>> Csepp writes: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> I don't think repeating that no forge sucks less advances the >>>> conversation towards any solution other than keeping the status quo, >>>> which can't really be called a solution. >>> Are we really talking about changing the official Guix forge: >>> https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/guix? >> I definitely am. > The real place to put efforts toward that goal should be in the GNU > project; this way we can continue to maintain shared resource, knowledge > and tooling as a project. I think packaging either sourcehut or gitea > and writing a Guix System service for it would provide opportunities to > experiment and perhaps one day move in that direction, so that's > something concrete that you can direct your efforts too. > Agreed. and speaking of that it seems its already something in the works as it was pointed elsewhere: (as trial at least.) sourcehut.gnu.org sourcehut.gnu.org hub <#> 🔗 https://sourcehut.gnu.org/