From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>
To: cayetano.santos@l2it.in2p3.fr, Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: emacs packaging: do we need to pull existing dependencies ?
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 18:58:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9a4151bd3be69433b86f0e86030d528a967979c.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1357psu1w.fsf@l2it.in2p3.fr>
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, dem 01.02.2023 um 08:44 +0100 schrieb Cayetano Santos:
> [D]o we need to pull most up-to-date dependencies, even if already
> present in current emacs, when upstream package requires them to
> keep backward compatibility ? Do we assume that guix emacs (28.2)
> already includes them, and remove the dependency from the inputs ? Is
> it a good strategy to deal with two different versions of a
> dependency?
The proper Guix way would actually be to unvendor those packages from
Emacs and offer them separately. We could certainly do this for quite
a number (e.g. org, cc-mode, ...), but it would be work that someone
has to do and that person better not be lazy like me and take several
months to add native-compilation ;)
> Say for example emacs-org-roam@2.2.2: it requires emacs-org 9.4,
> which is not specified in the package definition, meaning we always
> pull the latest available. Do we have to, provided that emacs
> releases with org? Maybe there is already a clear rule about this
> topic, but to me this is not clear. We have package definitions with
> both criteria.
I think it's important to think about this in terms of forward
compatibility. Is org-roam guaranteed to always work with "the current
version of Emacs, whatever that may happen to be"? In that case, you
could currently drop emacs-org. If it requires bleeding edge symbols
on the other hand, or may freely decide that it will need them, adding
emacs-org to the inputs is a good idea.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-04 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 7:44 emacs packaging: do we need to pull existing dependencies ? Cayetano Santos
2023-02-04 17:58 ` Liliana Marie Prikler [this message]
2023-02-05 10:50 ` Cayetano Santos
2023-02-05 19:46 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-02-06 16:53 ` Simon Tournier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-31 8:13 Emacs " Cayetano Santos
2023-01-29 18:27 Cayetano Santos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9a4151bd3be69433b86f0e86030d528a967979c.camel@gmail.com \
--to=liliana.prikler@gmail.com \
--cc=cayetano.santos@l2it.in2p3.fr \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).