From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MEAVOfKiSGC9OgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:44:02 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id qAX1NPKiSGAPIgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:44:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A6762BBB9 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:44:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37222 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJwJt-0008E1-Hj for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 05:44:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJwJX-0008CS-C8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 05:43:39 -0500 Received: from mail.zaclys.net ([178.33.93.72]:58259) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lJwJU-00006P-VD; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 05:43:39 -0500 Received: from guix-xps.local (82-64-145-38.subs.proxad.net [82.64.145.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zaclys.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 12AAhXBE050132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:43:34 +0100 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.zaclys.net 12AAhXBE050132 Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lle-bout@zaclys.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zaclys.net; s=default; t=1615373014; bh=12RCGXm43YnEWyRwolUds846ZWVGp5x9BQ9xqgAbsKc=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I3ZuMqq+UIm4hjft+VpE0P5lDxOuVxDKk+/KsPaAKWrXTxauXPiZ6fUPni87TSaSs f7fyUzqmG0YcRft5kRuvUKCF2BquH/iIJTnw9Lp2FRbhivwnRbhSi8Lavr+3w2IWEU +CirT6skwqPVsCoV3VtVljrzJHIt9ZP9y9fIGt6k= Message-ID: Subject: Re: GNU Guix (pull?) on i686 broke after zstd grafting From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E9o?= Le Bouter To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:43:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874khj5m6h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <91998d12df3c4a279f46cf50b15d47c99e064a46.camel@zaclys.net> <874khj5m6h.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jHy0wbS8RfogyePCXh4P" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.33.93.72; envelope-from=lle-bout@zaclys.net; helo=mail.zaclys.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1615373042; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=12RCGXm43YnEWyRwolUds846ZWVGp5x9BQ9xqgAbsKc=; b=hW7jWzkfKhGvpfbd9TIZk8hYHF4JjcQYM3oF+f4q+k/xh0tNlj9Z7vSpfwTIchPeVLxEMe qSK5c4LDZRWuCOGm+bCJ0+2i70T6iDRreIMRhetO1WJGwsv56cIK8L/n5X/bSqWp+O2e/h hKiIVKUdsHyDVfh+BQ3nEvebwzWe3EXLFt2NHq0dMx/95kTfKmsyOFxI2cktDfnQ/3m0Yp 7t6dL0y4zzR2eyDnseAqFGVK3eUWztUnfqhLBuX7CzxX1AowtX2w4emovFTxMpVUCjK550 jOCJA1hzyOi3NsEReq2tVfjTBdT8nq6XYMql6QnAPK9Lhab3VYXEJ5/ob7F/lQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1615373042; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CdiBQAL8OhWL98BunK3iqMYJjq6Cdcnesg5gMpdMCrisDCqsXPcuA16Zpx8ljtVRXYua0y A3wrJwI90RK6uAMqyUkFQkGl5UU9qOARsjWKleeuFUEYpeRAeEqupVgxyvZoi6Hnh61IWp HXJGbbOt85+iAYIpGpuq5f4sPQpRrg3i9d/UEv3XkzPp5OaDgSapHPhzBr0EZs1y74npBw zTLf6smmfLTc2Dk29QzspVoHTld933DGfaT+bmqDNtmKNqxVghTzRIqoQdFUiUqIfYWUt5 ap2UjDFrEqO+XOGLejpTXLV34fUneiYYbvO3bziVYEPry5MVpbaeM4W0tpurRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=zaclys.net header.s=default header.b=I3ZuMqq+; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=zaclys.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.19 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=zaclys.net header.s=default header.b=I3ZuMqq+; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=zaclys.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7A6762BBB9 X-Spam-Score: -5.19 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: LTrSojMJLjup --=-jHy0wbS8RfogyePCXh4P Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 11:37 +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi L=C3=A9o, Hi Ludo! > So I think there=E2=80=99s a genuine bug here. Could you take a look? A= t > worst, we should skip the offending test on i686 (and perhaps > ARMv7?). I reported upstream and I got an answer, waiting for fix but also we could do something based on their comment: > So now that we have plausible explanation, what can be done about it > ? >=20 > - Ignore this test. It's a just test error. Disable it. > - Change the test, so that it passes. For example, use a fixed nb of=20 > threads, like -T4. > - Update the rule regulating -T0, determining automatically a nb of > threads based on present nb of cores. Make it conditional for 32-bit > systems, select a limit for this case (slightly more complex, will > take time). > - Update the thread-pool policy to allocate new threads only when > needed, instead of up front (definitely more complex, will take even > more time). I am very tired now however, also not sure how to disable individual tests there. L=C3=A9o --=-jHy0wbS8RfogyePCXh4P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEFIvLi9gL+xax3g6RRaix6GvNEKYFAmBIotAACgkQRaix6GvN EKaj8BAAj1e66X5aoUjbKQtdl/CYEtoKarfmtWwV8M3mRDZ6lkKBeahHYHuOQgOe u+GKlPluuwJgYpUTDCGMetHHNV35wdbeTKcbfPOvs6VHN2E4CN2z/eEaVKnei+1E a482MYheTZqU6ctnKKFwiewxVD/fEJd3x2OAy7/EzXZNTFVRZq0xDvnDyVdlYOIp 7payuOVPjrdJ6gIdTwPV7PqVrjWVNIq7Wtobko7TAp4A1T0iCgmI8nb2W81wUz6E Y36+V9JNudsljF6hL6bZ0ZMT+Wsr1ZujsRhItIU0wU0XoTcO5ZW5oND4mO5P0T87 dWu+Q2yKxQtOk36ZYC10pHN+618qmZ4kKeLBpZfBcR6BbkpXDj7Tyt+SoQ3fcmXw +ava/hlIz5Jper8W4y7nb8eXsA7IGU9Hb/EPx3CVBtaGdbcxEFndMimO0r5NhAJf rxtDAqNxRJhdvYmvIStDTXlnTiveCEeOkM8UtuBQPXrDjJU9aFmdDrwN//fHDDWQ H2+x5jAHU7F64KJt8UwnyQAoQD73H+EVVeKXM89TL+Ef5xPzaNOXWCOoSI8CKtF0 V/0jwc3+eBeCKQv3+h4g2dBZYTToAPwcNjxGGIJ1bh8rhi6LoJoHbZYSXhkUpIVB qAMVfjGIZwWTDCEy89J3BCcwB6MutBWgDhMVY57+UdGFF7y7DiA= =3y1O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jHy0wbS8RfogyePCXh4P--