From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id eHySN71Se2bkLQEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:29:02 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id eHySN71Se2bkLQEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:29:02 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=philipmcgrath.com header.s=fm2 header.b=iJQQFmXA; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="C h+epqz"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1719358141; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Ymg9TcTx6OAJ9Opjtj/z2xDI2B1Ck+21l94WAKi2ytw=; b=tGQR7N8OOaFyJICIK5m51Ce3PGywYq5U2tW34iwGlVoYo1UgQGf5CrIreBCKrvgbpNmbbX wWBkTMQXlOog9dS5F7iXayOrwOH/4mKrw25tG/f8SBkepWlNmagHD4TWCicGxfy5f3a8A2 GiC5B1ZnK1qqCnXQLgcK94MI2ASP3fctEwe5VzB3MRIZ1H4rHLCxi7+gr1gi6IzO1xsHhy CdXfu2aaJMAM1tLIJltL/oVkbBRk7F9nReMoDFJxbO5hEZf5lv+54StGewl0zi+O7AR7Nq yM5hSYkrQsZIzuAKDwR0zwEpjL2hiApCNwLyBRXd80JCHa2ohLfIvdzLCX7JjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=philipmcgrath.com header.s=fm2 header.b=iJQQFmXA; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b="C h+epqz"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1719358141; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gGpOuN9UBe31LRsyiN1tkpD7nRAl2yNfMUf4XhHveEBgutmE927/BvcU7386kErfGCAgAd m5pnR0O76RQ7lS/r6ycpk0q+NUPAsvjZUQ28sjAWrYvCZ3l4JYSJtupbfAm0tWwg1Mhz1i iydMgWp81vdt0U73GYSaIgrsFsuWQJBkGBf3Y3h1Cd2W09ILWMPXzA+CIdXk3SFhQvbZss VySxqalpK5k4HLSCIQyb+RVyoW2PtRjEbxOvr9W3qg3e9+XfBa6oOyrqt3kXcrwXeQ94k6 7DrLgP2vxCLNfSuwNy++tJbcEO2LYMDmO1Os6p4Ce7frKt0bHuNqAhhmhp/13Q== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 024682400C for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:29:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [::1] (helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sME6y-0001Lv-7X; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:54:10 -0400 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::10] (helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sME6N-00019S-Hh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:53:34 -0400 Received: from fhigh3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.154]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sME5J-00036B-ES for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:53:10 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7284D114023F; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:07:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:07:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= philipmcgrath.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1719346078; x=1719432478; bh=Ymg9TcTx6O AJ9Opjtj/z2xDI2B1Ck+21l94WAKi2ytw=; b=iJQQFmXAaEQJ2XojoJ0DA39H5H xcWYKFfSZxps5spM0E8scv4Zwnl/2tXFNBirXR+JLO9bWNW6+AueiIkSX9R45YXP Bl75HaSZqD87yhG/eZSGCyY0BR7eklxQ5Gqad38DFfjA5sOGGeq7kwcWtp6zyox3 jdHv4G87EGXKqH9pufbnoAZWwUUnjdTCZfSjK0Ms5mDzZGtAVCnThRIEn9Ig9eHh dNCm9XFE7rIsrMfKG+kU+DGlfo2QrNsEzroDTJIL7/brxMSdTH4+ItHALYWwiJs/ Ah1xeXPS10MpLYEamm4rUrVr33Q/90cIAjwLLdVDchTvDVPr/0S9GsSZ8+Eg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1719346078; x= 1719432478; bh=Ymg9TcTx6OAJ9Opjtj/z2xDI2B1Ck+21l94WAKi2ytw=; b=C h+epqzqm6boTEhMI4S4T8HDiCyCUjBqPFN+I1vw0HBsSjvqHblSrTjMYBWgDZZCG UxV5B7Evao6C0LRWJ/lsH3jwlyB9m46858fkrdu9rZCCfQKqQsnWURdVWlAFd7gR tkWRYhldL/UUv/9DROzgupxN3G7nvqkZk6KNvR6lyC6GqBwCxD+ZwllwNS3CZkFT trBnEal59573S6JAI4PHcBVje6MDO41Yf2l6+a8EKcTR1j2Ul0xMkoNwCc/n+tfF gJy9q3tRbkW9UWrS/hn1ZXxKgzqE/PKdzj1c6dH+jQGuVl+PVpS0GFtMqXlc627W 5Kgn+S3p4Z29lg9CKnuUw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrtddtgdduudefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtvdejnecuhfhrohhmpefrhhhi lhhiphcuofgtifhrrghthhcuoehphhhilhhiphesphhhihhlihhpmhgtghhrrghthhdrtg homheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleeihffgffeiieekiedtgeehieekuddtgfekveeg gfduleeihfelhfefhfejteevnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgpdhguhhigidqqh grqdhfrhhonhhtphgrghgvrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehphhhilhhiphesphhhihhlihhpmhgtghhrrghthhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2b1146f3:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:07:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:07:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: qa.guix delays in processing patches To: Christopher Baines , =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Lars-Dominik Braun , guix-devel@gnu.org, Christopher Baines References: <87y17on4ao.fsf@gnu.org> <87bk4jjbdu.fsf@gnu.org> <87ed9a3ydf.fsf@gnu.org> <86bbccff-26c1-4a20-b8df-1faaacdd69be@app.fastmail.com> <87ed8vahwn.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87plsd3utr.fsf@cbaines.net> Content-Language: en-US From: Philip McGrath In-Reply-To: <87plsd3utr.fsf@cbaines.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=103.168.172.154; envelope-from=philip@philipmcgrath.com; helo=fhigh3-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: -10.05 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 024682400C X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -10.05 X-TUID: BUNgKoDCytB+ Hi Chris, On 6/19/24 09:50, Christopher Baines wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >> It’s unclear to me why issues are sometimes seemingly not picked up. >> Chris, do you have more insight into this? > > QA just looks at a small number of latest series [1] and those > associated issues so I'm guessing in this case the patch series was old > enough for QA not to be looking at it. This is mostly due to disk space > limitations for data.qa.guix.gnu.org. > > 1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/qa-frontpage.git/tree/scripts/guix-qa-frontpage.in#n154 > > Unfortunately the messaging is rather poor in this circumstance. I'm not sure this explains why the job was dropped after having been picked up, as I (belatedly) mentioned in my reply to Ludo’: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-06/msg00203.html > > I should have mentioned this in my last email, but, when I first sent the patch > series, it *had* been picked up as https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/71203 and > gotten to the "yet to process revision" state. I checked in on it a few times, > and it remained in that state: only the last time (before rebasing) did it say > "issue not found", though I'm not sure how long it had been since I'd last > checked. I guess one thing I'm realizing is I don't know how long is normal for > QA to take vs. when I should report a potential problem. On that last point, it's now been over a week since I rebased the series, and is still in the "yet to process revision" state. Is this normal? At least a few revisions created later seem to have reached "success": https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/revision/003695a6a66ab2a69506d2f5a689170ccc340505 https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/revision/d0e425b0f538a8762e3199f5223597835cfe75da (The later seems to have "start"ed after the patch had already been merged.) It's not clear to me how jobs are ordered in the queue, which makes it hard to tell if this is normal processing time or if something might be going wrong again. I think there can be a lot of value in QA, especially in catching regressions on architectures I don't have available. But, even ignoring the additional delay waiting for the May 26 job that disappeared, this feels to me like a disproportionate overhead for a routine package update. Thanks, Philip