From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id cHKZHwUJUWAZPwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:37:41 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id eC5NGwUJUWAJeAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:37:41 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FF9F12583 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 20:37:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33044 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMFVc-0005sm-4q for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:37:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMEma-0007kT-5n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:51:08 -0400 Received: from mail.zaclys.net ([178.33.93.72]:42927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMEmW-0005Sh-Oy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:51:07 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.44] (82-64-145-38.subs.proxad.net [82.64.145.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zaclys.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 12GIovha015245 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:50:58 +0100 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.zaclys.net 12GIovha015245 Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lle-bout@zaclys.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zaclys.net; s=default; t=1615920658; bh=MI3IE/6AkG1GMDyDRKEcMDBxd6WsvTFwv+EYm05KBUQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XhJKjJvmy9qaBRDx73wW41RcWMEpAPxrmceFQ9tapijzkfcMVBw6ZtavcVfZozGR0 EHhPwEKrzPviSlaN8g8fFspT9CZs9UjxxXmSuhwDy/fmWJDPpKzw6cveC5Zuq1fX14 lW9R9becp/T7DRBhCS1uUTVztWqJlAjzouLl02xc= Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release 1.2.1: zstd 1.4.4 -> 1.4.9: grafting or core-updates? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E9o?= Le Bouter To: zimoun Cc: Leo Famulari , Guix Devel Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:50:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <91998d12df3c4a279f46cf50b15d47c99e064a46.camel@zaclys.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-kyc8pGD5dKSjaN8fQmvb" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.33.93.72; envelope-from=lle-bout@zaclys.net; helo=mail.zaclys.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1615923461; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=MI3IE/6AkG1GMDyDRKEcMDBxd6WsvTFwv+EYm05KBUQ=; b=HNdrKEt6TwWHLE6igE8lUU3mvo2fBiXr/IIil/eqXYsS8Un7ckBLZoCMmoVxcVWGyhzULz xzw9XwubwIDMKSGsUBTviW1MqVxzXFZ46NAxyLoPGGGD3hjELxyMD1YrotM0oARYZyE2da nOXKBmYmR8XWbGXeyctda2wJtFIH3jBcxz4eS5kJurNDWgJhp431UyYJScYj/a+rMgggpf JdW9SiegEo5dK88gXFhzlS1itdYpHsYGe0oSDuDB3198D57wUI3jdP6YIqKxByyfnQ7If2 atjj+m9710pYlD63ccU8UR2VlBcuXbBQVQaylkRqx6F2Mt7m8RYKwCXR63nngg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1615923461; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ca7WPJ+v+ngCP7/oDN1MbFJzWrHMyjhUnrZD4Ii4keuLD3a9Zf8HBJMqvgfHKg0dORIYy9 LrtTClASpCJ219FaeLuDS1rzHbfSECLc01UraRJOJRBXbI2Ot0Ehcvoddrl+6otOa9HAms 42Av4sKRlKxmTob/PvXgu7E+RTXZmSxqxX81mB/3v4yrXrPVAXUmxIrv3vDBOdPI9EkHI7 CpIZxTK0tYJIey+62JaeXQzZ3jmx20jD65lOtBhYoJeofuSaebOluN6suCfQqmF4c/0VZL ivKzh8BWy4FURmSlQ5AqfSnB3j79hYdnQbxbGqJcFNUslD48swBO3h8dRCQKyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=zaclys.net header.s=default header.b=XhJKjJvm; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=zaclys.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.20 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=zaclys.net header.s=default header.b=XhJKjJvm; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=zaclys.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2FF9F12583 X-Spam-Score: -4.20 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: y6VfuHqHB/U5 --=-kyc8pGD5dKSjaN8fQmvb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 19:46 +0100, zimoun wrote: > Well, it seems better to send such changes to guix-patches, waiting > 15 > days, and then if no comment, push. It is what the manual describes: >=20 > Non-trivial patches should always be posted to > guix-patches@gnu.org (trivial patches include fixing typos, > etc.). [=E2=80=A6] >=20 > For patches that just add a new package, and a simple one, > it=E2=80=99s OK to > commit, if you=E2=80=99re confident [=E2=80=A6]. Likewise for pa= ckage > upgrades, except > upgrades that trigger a lot of rebuilds [=E2=80=A6]. >=20 > [=E2=80=A6] >=20 > [=E2=80=A6] If you didn=E2=80=99t receive any reply after two wee= ks, and if > you=E2=80=99re confident, it=E2=80=99s OK to commit. >=20 > >=20 > And from my understanding, it is a non-trivial patch which triggers a > lot of rebuilds. Double reasons. ;-) It's not just like any other patch, it's a security patch, so **15** days.. >=20 > Cheers, > simon --=-kyc8pGD5dKSjaN8fQmvb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEFIvLi9gL+xax3g6RRaix6GvNEKYFAmBQ/g0ACgkQRaix6GvN EKYQiQ/+PgjQF5uGEiENzIoqW8brQjlV8cgoc4HhM8t2YyIdjDRA9Yps7IATRWFy SeEbn140Cge8GUK6E4YVoLu1KYzwlqQk+wfXkcP55wZBjeqBk76wRn3uEbW7qd19 aZX3C9pXvZKrYV4odyBQ2CFitVteYOe5+fGdU00hJ4/IepvMGnMl58EI+VDKMicQ gDQNzE3kjnrD1FK+IcwMfueBWMKfvh0zkOIdHiG3Rg8HkJscoT7TyntcmY2VVbwP ZnlAKZ3cgK39ysYZopM90LsErdUIbzbwBvVDzNVKewEUTvJekPTJye1xYuq7P5DD Aw4x306TjXMoLj9RiJqvtIVlE1BFkBvKTOQoQSm44w27V+2Z6iLIeYynA81iCO6v 6l2t/rcdU54L6VuiBquIeVgmCSdLjXFp05Gs145546nhj2uHh8AY/uUgROLma0Us Fi72gyaBbeYgAVkq1tbZt61z67NI23gux5PxOS+6UiXuFg3wdl529xQghjigVwX+ XHXMQB2ETJYhpMoRDaq5XpM0xQhdRTEh5n8Y3LZFDfJ6pu/EWy6OMOVTL5PTCTgC 2CJxIOYDFFi7aNwxc8QrXCNboDv2D6e6hvHeyd0GNVSnN3EAezP/WfwcrS6lVJHT GKnDSRdoZzUv8aHw/3cg9e71jQ5iYWp0PhFUSGwnyU9HCb6DeOU= =V0sq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-kyc8pGD5dKSjaN8fQmvb--