From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Rename texlive to tex. Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:50:17 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20160524050755.GA14800@jocasta.intra> <87lh2zsufx.fsf@gnu.org> <20160524160954.GA20389@jocasta.intra> <87shx78m9q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5HPa-0006fP-3J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 14:50:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5HPX-0000xV-Ri for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 14:50:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87shx78m9q.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Roel Janssen Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Guix-devel On 2016-05-24 11:16, Roel Janssen wrote: > John Darrington writes: > >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:59:14AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: >> >> John Darrington writes: >> >> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: >> > * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Rename texlive.scm to >> tex.scm. >> > * gnu/packages/texlive.scm: Rename file to tex.scm. >> > * gnu/packages/tex.scm: Renamed from texlive.scm. >> > * gnu/packages/algebra.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/docbook.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/engineering.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/gettext.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/lisp.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/maths.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/music.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/plotutils.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/python.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > * gnu/packages/scheme.scm: Rename texlive to tex. >> > >> > What is the purpose of doing that? I thought that texlive was >> the chosen >> > name that the project had. >> > >> > I think there are a few other implementations of TeX in the >> wild (though >> > mostly unmaintained). Furthermore, I think Knuth has a >> trademark on the word "tex". >> > >> > J' >> >> See this thread: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-05/msg00702.html >> >> I want to add Texmaker (an editor for TeX). Putting it in >> texlive.scm >> wouldn't really fit because it's not part of Texlive. So, the >> idea is >> to put everything TeX-related into one file (tex.scm). >> >> Oh I see. I thought you were renaming the package itself, not the >> file in which >> its definition resides (saying "Rename texlive.scm to tex.scm" would >> have >> made this clearer). > > You're right, that would make it more clear. I will change it in the > new patch. See the git log for examples of the commit message format for such cases. Notably, you can list all affected files with a single "Adjust module import" message. I believe ChangeLog convention also allows one to leave out the affected files and simply say something like "Adjust all affected modules". -- `~Eric