Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Rename texlive to tex.

[Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>]

On 2016-05-24 11:16, Roel Janssen wrote:
> John Darrington writes:
> 
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:59:14AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
>> 
>>      John Darrington writes:
>> 
>>      > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
>>      >      * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Rename texlive.scm to 
>> tex.scm.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/texlive.scm: Rename file to tex.scm.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/tex.scm: Renamed from texlive.scm.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/algebra.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/docbook.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/engineering.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/gettext.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/gnome.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/lisp.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/maths.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/music.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/plotutils.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/python.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >      * gnu/packages/scheme.scm: Rename texlive to tex.
>>      >
>>      > What is the purpose of doing that?  I thought that texlive was 
>> the chosen
>>      > name that the project had.
>>      >
>>      > I think there are a few other implementations of TeX in the 
>> wild (though
>>      > mostly unmaintained).  Furthermore, I think Knuth has a 
>> trademark on the word "tex".
>>      >
>>      > J'
>> 
>>      See this thread:
>>        
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-05/msg00702.html
>> 
>>      I want to add Texmaker (an editor for TeX).  Putting it in 
>> texlive.scm
>>      wouldn't really fit because it's not part of Texlive.  So, the 
>> idea is
>>      to put everything TeX-related into one file (tex.scm).
>> 
>> Oh I see.  I thought you were renaming the package itself, not the 
>> file in which
>> its definition resides (saying "Rename texlive.scm to tex.scm" would 
>> have
>> made this clearer).
> 
> You're right, that would make it more clear.  I will change it in the
> new patch.

See the git log for examples of the commit message format for such 
cases.  Notably, you can list all affected files with a single "Adjust 
module import" message.  I believe ChangeLog convention also allows one 
to leave out the affected files and simply say something like "Adjust 
all affected modules".

-- 
`~Eric