From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manolis Ragkousis Subject: Re: Rebasing core-updates-next branch Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:57:34 +0300 Message-ID: References: <9cd9387c-589d-5bc2-475b-d12fd6c10ff5@gmail.com> <87zipnnwkx.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMxFy-00044h-GP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:57:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMxFw-0006BB-Ol for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:57:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zipnnwkx.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost , Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, On 07/12/16 10:29, Alex Kost wrote: > Is there a reason for this? Are you going to commit something there > that needs to be based on core-updates? If it's just the "time to do > that", then I think it's not really needed. Yes my work is based on commits from core-updates and in order to push Hurd related patches to core-updates-next I need to update it. On 07/12/16 09:04, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Do we need to rebase? Is a merge not possible? > It's definitely possible but I agree with Ludo on this. It's better to avoid unnecessary merge commits. Btw I just noticed that commit bd46fdc is not signed by anyone. How should I handle this one? Thank you, Manolis