From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Brielmaier Subject: Re: Testing the installer Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:47:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87o8v8qq59.fsf@inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itVWZ-0006hQ-78 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:47:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itVWV-0000Pl-5p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:47:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87o8v8qq59.fsf@inria.fr> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= , guix-devel On 12.01.20 23:13, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hello Guix! > > One of the lessons from the 1.0.0 screw-up was that we should test the > graphical installer itself: > > https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/gnu-guix-1.0.1-released/ > > I think we should try to do that before the next release; not doing it > means testing by hand, which also takes a lot of time. I did a quick test by hand and opened a bug: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39199