From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: List of failing packages Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 15:23:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4fa52687a643221e32009113fa4f42b3932eb0c7.camel@gnu.org> <05DEF5E9-ADE1-4C13-B24D-C2BA5675F43E@lepiller.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33639) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRdG6-0001L4-T6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 09:23:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <05DEF5E9-ADE1-4C13-B24D-C2BA5675F43E@lepiller.eu> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Julien Lepiller , guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 14:51 +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le 4 novembre 2019 13:28:57 GMT+01:00, Roel Janssen a > écrit : > > Dear Guix, > > > > I'm trying to contribute to GNU Guix again, and I'd like to see if > > I > > can solve build failures to make for a more stable Guix. It would > > be > > very convenient to have a list of packages that are currently > > failing > > to build, and perhaps also some history on it (how many times did > > the > > build fail, and since when does it fail). > > > > Does such a list exist, and if so, where can I find it? > > > > Kind regards, > > Roel Janssen > > I think you'ne looking for https://ci.guix.gnu.org. look for > evaluations of guix master, and their failures. You can also look for > evaluations of a package with the search bar at the top right. But is there a list of *all packages that fail ot build*? So, not only just a single evaluation like: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/8538?status=failed But a list of ~11000 packages and their build status (like Hydra showed). With Hydra, when clicking on a failed build you could see previous builds of that same package and its success or failure of them. I found that very useful. Kind regards, Roel Janssen